Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some Good News: Government Spending Fell in Last Three Months
Unleash Prosperity ^ | 05/01/2025 | Stephen Moore

Posted on 05/04/2025 6:07:13 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

The U.S. GDP shrank slightly in the first quarter – something we never like to see. This data predates the last four weeks of the trade/tariff war trauma, so we are worried about the second quarter coming in negative – which would technically mean recession. If we could get the tax bill signed sealed and delivered, that would provide immediate juice for the economy. Instead, Congress dithers, and they will get blamed for the technical recession.

But there was some good news in the report. Much of the “growth” under Biden was “fake growth” driven by trillions of extra government spending and debt.

In Trump’s first quarter back in office, he managed not only to slow government purchases, but to decrease them slightly—the first time in three years. That shows up as a subtraction to GDP.

But here’s the showstopper: investment (the impetus of long-run real economic growth) soared, up 22% at a seasonally adjusted annualized rate. This is the rocket fuel for future growth that America needs. This was the opposite of tepid business investment under Biden.

On balance, a quarter with surging investment and slowing government is not bad at all.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: government; spending

1 posted on 05/04/2025 6:07:13 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Exactly and why the GDP is down.


2 posted on 05/04/2025 6:12:13 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

How many percent of the US GDP is attributed to Government Spending?


3 posted on 05/04/2025 6:14:53 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

about 23%

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYONGDA188S


4 posted on 05/04/2025 6:25:05 PM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

No more “throwing gold bars off the Titanic”!


5 posted on 05/04/2025 6:27:13 PM PDT by griswold3 (Truth Beauty and Goodness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“If we could get the tax bill signed sealed and delivered, that would provide immediate juice for the economy.”

BS. Taxing in of itself does not make for a better economy. How about a clean bill that removes 1,000,000 federal employees for starters, that leaves us with a paltry 2,000,000 fed employees. It is a pretty good guess we’ll survive.


6 posted on 05/04/2025 6:37:34 PM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

That chart needs to scroll to the right. Writer likely didn’t do it. Imports exploded.

GDP = Consumption + Govt Spending + Investment + (Exports - Imports). The surge in Imports generated the downtick in GDP. It will reverse when the Imports in this quarter cease that surge.

As for firing 1 million of the 3 million Federal Employees, about 1.2 million are DoD, so if you want to protect that, you have only 1.8 to work with. So 1 million extracted from 1.8M leaves 800K doing what 1.8 used to do, or trying to.

Doesn’t seem likely . . . especially if we insulate Border control from the cut. And NTSB. Or whatever else you think is useful.

BTW the firing requires severance, so there will be a significant cost, as well as 18 months of COBRA.


7 posted on 05/04/2025 6:50:09 PM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: quantim

It would provide “certainty” for sure


8 posted on 05/04/2025 7:06:12 PM PDT by griswold3 (Truth Beauty and Goodness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

Also ... My understanding is government employee COST is counted in GDP. With so many federal workers laid off due to DOGE, that also would reduce GDP.


9 posted on 05/04/2025 7:47:10 PM PDT by Bobbyvotes (I am in mid-80's and I am not gonna change my opinions.. etc. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Th3 GDP has been negative for at least 3 years.


10 posted on 05/04/2025 8:48:16 PM PDT by cowboyusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

FTA——In Trump’s first quarter in office, he not only slowed government purchases,
but decreased them slightly—the first time in three years. That shows up as a subtraction to GDP.

But here’s the showstopper: investment (long-run real economic growth) soared, up 22% at a seasonally adjusted annualized rate. This is the rocket fuel for future growth that America needs.

This was the opposite of business investment under bungling Biden.


11 posted on 05/04/2025 11:42:08 PM PDT by Liz (This then is how we should pray...."Our Father, who art in heaven......" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Under Biden they changed the definition of a recession. I bet they change it back if we do shrink 2 quarters in a row.


12 posted on 05/05/2025 1:43:31 AM PDT by for-q-clinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

If imports are calculated in the GNP then the massive buy prior to Trump taking charge should be considered.


13 posted on 05/05/2025 4:27:53 AM PDT by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson