That means it was one magic loogie.
Posted on 03/18/2025 7:27:09 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
“To all those on FR who accused many of us of being crazy conspiracy theorists on this topic—I accept your apology.”
To those of you that have to believe you get powder burns when shooting a rifle i. Order to push your agenda I know you will never apologize.
I want to hear the conflicts in the original notes made by the parkland doctors and then how that of a murdered Presidential body was tampered with!
Remember the Dallas police and news media first said the rifle they found was a 7.65 German Mauser. There’s a later 1980s interview of the cop, Roger Craig, who held it saying it wasn’t a Carcano that showed up.
My question as well. It’s not the shooters who get the burns — it’s the shootees.
Something tells me that the biggest thing coming out of this release will be mostly just a reenergizing of the JFK book and conspiracy industry.
See post 40.
Or JD Tippit?
That means it was one magic loogie.
Same deal. You only get powder burns when shooting a pistol if you put your hand in front of the muzzle, block the compensator ports, block the muzzle brake or the thing explodes.
If people got powder burns every time they fired a post 1890 pistol, ranges would be empty. How do you not know this?
Even if you assume Stone meant ‘gunshot residue’ - the tests of the day would only detect a then-modern pistol’s residue in concentrations that would appear on the hands and forearms of the shooter, and then only if he hadn’t sweated much or washed his hands. It is only in the last *40* years that GSR tests get sensitive enough to detect it for days even if you’ve washed your hands... The Kennedy assassination was more than 60 years ago. You do the math.
Again, the lack of powder burns or detectable gunshot residue means zilch.
You haven’t lived until you’ve had a primer fail
Hmm. Never heard that story or read that in any of the JFK assassination books I read after the fact. Oswald tried to shoot the theater manager when he was confronted inside, but his gun malfunctioned. So he did have a gun on him.
The doctors/coroners botched the autopsy, showing the throat wound as an entry wound. That mistake got a lot of people excited.
They casketed the body without the brain. The feds were demanding they release the body, though Texas officials considered it a homicide case and weren’t happy.
Kennedy himself called Dallas “nut country”. This murder resulted in the 1967 presidential succession amendment to the Constitution.
I am familiar with the test. I am also familiar with the fact that the 1960s version of the test didn’t work for crap if the subject had sweated, washed their hands, etc. Dallas on a warm November day... couldn’t possibly be sweating at all, right? And there wasn’t some time in the hours between shooting Tippett and getting caught in the theater where he could have washed his hands, right?
.32 acp Magtech in a Beretta Tomcat mousegun.
Turned my head and flipped that dud out after 20 seconds heh
I think they mean powder residue from using the carbine at the Schoolbook Depository, and the pistol on Tippett.
There have been 60 plus years of drama queening. It’s endless. There are far more interesting questions about Crooks and his attempt these days anyway.
Powder ‘burns’? Did someone mean residue? Did the tech exist in ‘63 to swab for powder residue?
Had a couple of primers burst in a .270 bolt gun. Burning powder makes it back around the bolt, and through the vent(s) at the bolt/chamber interface.
This. There’s definitely things here.
How did a kid working in an assisted living facility have those bank accounts and money?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.