Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FAA bans drones in parts of NJ, notice threatens 'deadly force' for 'imminent security threat' | Map
6abc.com ^ | Staff

Posted on 12/19/2024 6:27:32 AM PST by RoosterRedux

There is a major development in the ongoing drone saga in New Jersey.

Several federal agencies had tried to put to it bed earlier this week by saying they found nothing out of the ordinary.

However, the Federal Aviation Administration has now issued temporary flying restrictions (TFR) in multiple cities across New Jersey, including several locations in our area, due to "special security reasons."

The TFR areas include the city of Camden, Gloucester City, Winslow Township, Evesham, Hancock's Bridge in Lower Alloways Township in Salem County, Westampton, Burlington and Hamilton. Flying drones are also banned in Bridgewater, Cedar Grove, North Brunswick, Metuchen, Westampton, South Brunswick, Edison, Branchburg, Sewaren, Jersey City, Harrison, Elizabeth, Bayonne, Clifton and Kearny.

Here is a map of those sites where flying drones are now temporarily banned:

The small red circles each indicate "one nautical mile" radius flight restrictions in these areas, including from the ground up to 400 feet. 400 feet is the altitude at which recreational drones are allowed to operate under FAA rules.

RELATED: Drones were not tracking missing radioactive material in New Jersey, DEP says

The previously issued TFRs for Bedminster and Picatinny Arsenal remain in place.

These areas have all now been deemed "National Defense Airspace."

Unmanned aircraft are no longer allowed in those areas from now through January 17, unless approved by the federal government.

(Excerpt) Read more at 6abc.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aviation; drones; newsfromgroversmill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 12/19/2024 6:27:32 AM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: iontheball; Openurmind; Churchjack; eastforker; Levy78; maddog55; Jonty30; GingisK; Mark17; ...

Ping — HT to Freeper iontheball


2 posted on 12/19/2024 6:29:27 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Emerson (paraphrased): "If you strike at the king, don't fail." The Democrats failed. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

This should get interesting—lets see if the ban is enforced with shoot-downs.


3 posted on 12/19/2024 6:32:35 AM PST by cgbg (It is time to pull the Deep State out of the mass media--like ticks from a dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Meaning: These are foreign adversary drones.

Oh shiite / mofo feds ...


4 posted on 12/19/2024 6:32:43 AM PST by Uncle Miltie ("Israel will just have to ... kill more Christians” - FR's own "nitzy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
lets see if the ban is enforced with shoot-downs.

It won't be.

5 posted on 12/19/2024 6:34:13 AM PST by pepsi_junkie ("We want no Gestapo or Secret Police. F. B. I. is tending in that direction." - Harry S Truman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
So the drones are no cause for alarm, except in those areas.
Why there and not elsewhere?
There must be at least as many operators as there are drones.
Who are they and where are they?

6 posted on 12/19/2024 6:35:36 AM PST by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Yep that’s what I was thinking.....I want to see how they enforce it


7 posted on 12/19/2024 6:42:06 AM PST by V_TWIN (America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Ahhh...so now we see the point of all of this. To restrict us.


8 posted on 12/19/2024 6:47:13 AM PST by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

We need to give up some more rights and give them more power and money. That will save us. /s


9 posted on 12/19/2024 6:55:58 AM PST by alternatives?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

This should get interesting—lets see if the ban is enforced with shoot-downs.
__________________
Yes, this will be couch time for our control freak gubberment.


10 posted on 12/19/2024 7:01:01 AM PST by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

We’ll still see drones. They just likely don’t want the hobbyist copycat drones and small craft to interfere or collide with their nuke sniffing craft.


11 posted on 12/19/2024 7:01:54 AM PST by LittleBillyInfidel (This tagline has been formatted to fit the screen. Some content has been edited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LittleBillyInfidel

...and along a path toward DC


12 posted on 12/19/2024 7:05:42 AM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

That should scare them off... /s


13 posted on 12/19/2024 7:06:11 AM PST by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

Not necessarily…off-book black budget ops the “normal” government has no knowledge of.


14 posted on 12/19/2024 7:29:48 AM PST by bigbob (Yes. We ARE going back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LittleBillyInfidel

Ok, so these drones only sniff at night. What’s to stop the nuke guys from moving whatever across the country during the daytime, huh? The government’s explanation doesn’t pass the sniff test.


15 posted on 12/19/2024 7:41:28 AM PST by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Deadly force? Are they going to shoot anyone holding a controller?


16 posted on 12/19/2024 7:43:22 AM PST by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Since the supposed mystery drones only come out to play at night, why ban all drones 24 hrs a day. This is going to hurt a lot of drone pilots who fly their drones for business. Maybe it is just an excuse to restrict airspace even more.


17 posted on 12/19/2024 7:47:00 AM PST by skyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

I still have a bad feeling that these drones are a red flag exercise to distract from a real drone attack on Trump.


18 posted on 12/19/2024 8:17:10 AM PST by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Camden, are you kidding me Camden?


19 posted on 12/19/2024 8:57:25 AM PST by exPBRrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

🤔 Deadly force…against the drones or the drone operators, if they can find them that is.


20 posted on 12/19/2024 9:02:33 AM PST by Mastador1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson