Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Recession into 2028 Trump Does Not Understand
Armstrong Economics ^ | 17 Nov 24 | Martin Armstrong

Posted on 11/17/2024 1:53:22 PM PST by delta7

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Waiting for the anti-Armstrong comments.
1 posted on 11/17/2024 1:53:22 PM PST by delta7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: delta7

The Recession into 2028 NOBODY Understands


2 posted on 11/17/2024 2:00:53 PM PST by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delta7

Oh please, enough of this stupid crap that tariffs are bad. We yave bene here before and tariffs work.

Printing to much money, being in massive debt and increasing fuel costs intentionally is way more an impact on inflation.

Tariffs are a tool for fair trade and diplomacy, not economic management,, it is about regulating fair trade and Trump knows this well


3 posted on 11/17/2024 2:03:01 PM PST by Skwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delta7

There is the fact that Trump has successfully managed large businesses for decades. Something Armstrong has not done. I would guess he has a pretty good understanding of economics.


4 posted on 11/17/2024 2:03:32 PM PST by Dartoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delta7
you said that Trump and RFK would not listen to you

Smart move, Mr. President & RFK


5 posted on 11/17/2024 2:03:35 PM PST by canuck_conservative (NATO - now celebrating 75 successful years of keeping the Russian monsters out!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delta7

Tariffs are great for balancing trade and protecting essential sectors of the economy.

But they should never be considered a sole revenue source. That’s sheer ignorance.

Tariffs could not even fund Defense, much less all the other things government does.


6 posted on 11/17/2024 2:06:51 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delta7

He’s wrong. Tariffs are a bargaining chip. Why does the US have to follow the globalist trend (agenda)? The US can make the trend. We have every resource at our disposal to do so.

Here’s a good reason Trump doesn’t listen to this clown...

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/china/china-v-us-trade-war/

“China will become the largest economy in the world and take the crown from the United States because America lacks the political stability to foster long-term economic growth like China.”

China’s economy is imploding and Trump can crush it altogether with tariffs.


7 posted on 11/17/2024 2:07:33 PM PST by HYPOCRACY (Democracy is dead. Long live the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delta7
Waiting for the anti-Armstrong comments.

OK (but I'm not into him enough to be "anti")

The entire issue is NOT that companies moved offshore for cheaper labor. That is the Marxist excuse. They moved because of the taxation. Anyone who lists taxation alone without citing regulation (which is much harder to quantify) is a simpleton.

There you go.

8 posted on 11/17/2024 2:20:14 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delta7

The Great Finance Economist Armstrong. No. Tariffs will not increase inflation. Only increasing the money supply increases inflation. That and only that IS inflation. Changes in prices and price levels are results of inflation. Controlling inflation by treating tariffs, or instituting price controls or other financial nostrums only treat the symptoms and only change those symptoms. Reducing inflation requires reducing money creation/government borrowing. Reducing the trillion dollars of taxes a year that finances the debt requires cutting spending below the level of the previous year every year.


9 posted on 11/17/2024 2:23:36 PM PST by arthurus (covfefe 0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dartoid

Apparently he does not understand Trump.


10 posted on 11/17/2024 2:33:31 PM PST by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: delta7

With the current socialist government yes tariffs will not work. Restoring our government to a constitutional one, with the enumerated powers only, tariffs will more than pay for it.


11 posted on 11/17/2024 2:40:35 PM PST by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delta7

But it is going to raise the prices on BMWs and Mercedes’.


12 posted on 11/17/2024 3:00:19 PM PST by bray (It's not racist to be racist against races the DNC hates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delta7
Tariffs should encourage consumers to "buy American," and encourage manufacturers to "source American."

Anyone who wants to buy a foreign product can still do so, and pay for the privilege of having it.

-PJ

13 posted on 11/17/2024 3:04:59 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Exactly. So many people think a tariff means all access to a certain product is cut off. No, just the ones from countries who have unfair trading practices with us.

Those products made here or other countries that do not hinder American products will be just fine, and we might even see industry here make up the difference. Supply and demand still work.


14 posted on 11/17/2024 3:20:48 PM PST by Alas Babylon! (Repeal the Patriot Act; Abolish the DHS; reform FBI top to bottom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: delta7

No anti-Armostrong comments, but he is wrong.


15 posted on 11/17/2024 3:27:35 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim W N

Never heard of this guy. Sounds like a politician.


16 posted on 11/17/2024 3:30:14 PM PST by abbastanza (Oh boy. Can't wait. Go nuts kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

“The entire issue is NOT that companies moved offshore for cheaper labor. That is the Marxist excuse. They moved because of the taxation.”
Anyone who lists taxation alone without citing regulation (which is much harder to quantify) is a simpleton.
___________________________________________________________

The macro economy is far more complex, and political, than most people care to realize. There’s no “simple fix,” and all of the options still have a little hair on them.

Neither Armstrong, Trump, or Musk (especially now when he’s arguing publicly with Trump over who should be Treasury Secretary) will fix “the economy” with simple and quick nostrums or cheer leading.


17 posted on 11/17/2024 3:49:52 PM PST by Bob Wills is still the king (Just a Texas Playboy at heart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bob Wills is still the king
Neither Armstrong, Trump, or Musk (especially now when he’s arguing publicly with Trump over who should be Treasury Secretary) will fix “the economy” with simple and quick nostrums or cheer leading.

I've studied regulatory racketeering since the late '90s and am probably somewhat responsible for its increase in sophistication using layers of foundations for money laundering purposes. Yeah, it's a tangled mess. The creeps at the Fed are masters of it, using banks to the same ends.

18 posted on 11/17/2024 4:06:10 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: delta7

“Waiting for the anti-Armstrong comments.”

Here you go:

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — A former currency trader who prosecutors say ran a $3 billion ponzi scheme pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit securities fraud and commodities fraud, the U.S. Attorney’s Office said late Thursday. Prosecutors said Martin Armstrong, former head of Princeton Economics, defrauded 139 investors of about $700 million between 1992 and 1999. Armstrong, 56, faces up to five years in prison and a fine of $250,000. He has been in jail since 2000 stemming from related charges brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/princeton-economics-trader-pleads-guilty-to-securities-fraud


19 posted on 11/17/2024 4:08:22 PM PST by Pelham (President Eisenhower. Operation Wetback 1953-54)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abbastanza

I think we’re headed for some economic trouble but most don’t understand that economic good or harm is the result of events of at least 6 months to a year or more earlier.

Bloated mostly unconstitutional gov’t spending and flooding the money supply with printed dollars (inflation) under Biden will be the main culprit.


20 posted on 11/17/2024 4:08:48 PM PST by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson