Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JD Vance: Trump Said Military Should Go After ‘Far-Left Lunatics Who Are Rioting’
Breitbart ^ | 10/27/2024 | Pam Key

Posted on 10/27/2024 8:31:27 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

Senator JD Vance (R-OH) said Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union” that when former President Donald Trump was speaking about “far-left lunatics who were rioting” when he said the military should go after the “enemy within.”

Vance said, “We’re not talking about the public policy. Can we talk about how Americans can’t afford groceries? Can we talk about how Americans can’t afford the cost of housing? Can we talk about that a lot of people out there and Erie, Pennsylvania, they’re the ones who suffer and die when people like Mark Esper and Mark Milley don’t obey the commander in chief’s orders.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: andtheywill; courtmartialesper; courtmartialmilley; farleft; insubordination; lunatics; markesper; markmilley; military; rioting; trump; vance; yestheyshould
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Tapper must be pissy after this
1 posted on 10/27/2024 8:31:27 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Anarchists = domestic terrorists

BLM riots = domestic terrorists

Pro-Hamas rioters = domestic terrorists


2 posted on 10/27/2024 8:35:00 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

That’s what riot police are for. So how did MacArthur get away with it in DC against the vets?


3 posted on 10/27/2024 8:38:11 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Someone needs to explain to Vance. This is not the job of the military, nor is the military needed.

The whole purpose of Obama/Holder establishing BLM was to give DOJ/FBI an excuse to take control of America’s 3000+ independent police and sheriffs departments, using the power of Fed.gov and expansive “civil rights” laws.

Remove that, and America’s communities will police themselves.


4 posted on 10/27/2024 8:41:36 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Dunno. Maybe because DC is a federal reservation? I don’t know.

Will say this though, pretty sure the Bonus Marchers were influenced by, and quite possible led and recruited by, Bolshevik agitators.


5 posted on 10/27/2024 8:43:05 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Start with the Black Looters Movement. I’m sure Walmart would really appreciate it.


6 posted on 10/27/2024 8:44:00 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Funny how the media handed the ball off to treasonous RINOs to carry Harris across the goal line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

> Someone needs to explain to Vance. This is not the job of the military… <

Right you are. If we can do it, they can do it. So let’s keep that genie in the bottle.


7 posted on 10/27/2024 8:46:11 AM PDT by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

no not the military... local law enforcement will do just fine with their leashes disconnected.


8 posted on 10/27/2024 8:47:04 AM PDT by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

When he’s called out on his sophomoric rhetorical fallacies, he resorts to talking over the person he’s supposed to be interviewing. Childish.


9 posted on 10/27/2024 8:48:12 AM PDT by rightwingcrazy (;-,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

BTTT


10 posted on 10/27/2024 8:53:46 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Hmmm, how about the illustrious 101st Airborne and its deployment under Eisenhower in the American South? Evidently a President can use the racisms excuse and military arms can be used anywhere in the CONUS.

Except, of course, in the defense of law-abiding middle and working class Whites.


11 posted on 10/27/2024 8:54:01 AM PDT by TTFlyer (Lenin: that by the infliction of terror, a well-organized minority can conquer a nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Wrong! Sic the 85,000 brand new armed IRS agents on them!


12 posted on 10/27/2024 8:54:15 AM PDT by null and void (If the government won't protect the vote, the border, the citizens, then why have that government?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Posse comitatus says no bueno.


13 posted on 10/27/2024 8:54:45 AM PDT by freedomjusticeruleoflaw (Strange that a man with his wealth would have to resort to prostitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

BTTT


14 posted on 10/27/2024 8:56:01 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88; EBH

Someone needs to explain to Vance. This is not the job of the military, nor is the military needed.

The whole purpose of Obama/Holder establishing BLM was to give DOJ/FBI an excuse to take control of America’s 3000+ independent police and sheriffs departments, using the power of Fed.gov and expansive “civil rights” laws.

Remove that, and America’s communities will police themselves.


Do Police Have a Duty To Protect Individuals?
Ehline Law Firm ^ | Michael Ehline
Posted on 10/25/2024, 8:22:45 AM by EBH

We Americans have no general civil right to sue the police for failure to provide protection. In a nutshell, you cannot sue a government agency or a school district unless it’s done within a certain period of time after suffering an injury or loss. Even then, you can only sue the police or the Department of Social Services for certain things.

Providing you with your own personal protection services is not law enforcement’s function. In essence, since these are the king’s men, they are his sovereign representatives, shielded under the ancient doctrine of sovereign immunity.

Time and time again, left-wing politicians have argued that we don’t need private guns since we have police while simultaneously asserting we must also defund the police because of “systemic racism.” In a nutshell, their advocates at the New York Times, Atlantic, Washington Post, CNN, Mother Jones, etc., argue that socialism and a welfare state are incompatible with self-defense rights.

Those on the right argue we have a Second Amendment to guard against a corrupt government and to protect our families and businesses. In the middle, everyday people try to make sense of it all. I am Los Angeles personal injury attorney Michael Ehline.

I am a world-famous, award-winning attorney, honorably discharged U.S. Marine, legal historian, and expert on gun laws and firearms safety. Below, I will present the law of municipal police and cover why police have no general duty to protect individuals. Let’s go!

(Excerpt) Read more at ehlinelaw.com …

https://ehlinelaw.com/blog/do-police-have-a-duty-to-protect-me#:~:text=The%20United%20States%20Constitution%20does,injury%20law%20firm%20Ehline%20Law.


15 posted on 10/27/2024 8:58:41 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (We have no shortage of so-called experts! America has the most . aristocrats in history!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

No one has to explain anything to Vance. The article tells you what Vance and DJT really said. C’mon Freepers, read the articles and watch the vids.


16 posted on 10/27/2024 9:07:12 AM PDT by GMThrust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Vance did just great against a totally obnoxious and dishonest interrogator.


17 posted on 10/27/2024 9:07:14 AM PDT by enumerated (81 million votes my ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Right.

Free speech is OK and demonstrating comes under that heading. Rioting is not!

It’s like ... ‘You are free to drive a car. Yo are NOT free to drive your car 70mph onto a playground!’


18 posted on 10/27/2024 9:12:34 AM PDT by SMARTY (In politics, stupidity is not a handicap. Napoleon Bonaparte I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Trump has been using the military and national guard to root out our “enemies from within” for 8 years, and he will continue the carnage publicly soon.


19 posted on 10/27/2024 9:16:14 AM PDT by Fairhairedboy (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

The Posse Comitatus Act does not apply on federal enclaves like Washington DC. Federal troops may be lawfully deployed to maintain order in civil disturbances there.

Most famously, it was regularly done during the anti-war protests at the Pentagon during the Vietnam war.


20 posted on 10/27/2024 9:16:43 AM PDT by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson