Posted on 10/07/2024 11:32:42 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
As usual with Owens, I don’t think she believes a word of what she says. It’s all a grift. Just as she laughed with Joe Rogan just 2-3 yrs ago about people who “actually believe” in the Resurrection of Christ, and then suddenly started posting “Christ is King” after she started being criticized by former (Jewish) boss Ben Shapiro. Candace got her start being buddies with the NAACP. Anyone who listens to her is a fool.
Owens is constantly embarrassing herself and has an overweening notion of her own intelligence.
She seems more interested in being a provocative political entertainer (if not propagandist) than a thoughtful political commentator.
““Why don’t anti-Zionists devote their energy to delegitimizing Pakistan?”
Because Pakistan doesn’t control the weather, nor does it drive them absolutely mad from mindless, blind rage.
Like Dennis Prager very much. He is a thoughtful intellectual on the radio. When Rush Limbaugh was in a commercial break or maybe had a sub host on, I would listen to Dennis a lot. But I like Candace too. Don’t like everything she says but people are complicated and are often on a journey of change. Under the influence of her husband she has converted to Catholicism and she believes. I think she does research and don’t find her argumentation nearly as specious as some here do. Tired of some conservatives attitude of: You must not criticize Israel. Whatever they do isn’t to be questioned.
What happened to them last October 7 was horrible but they are not without their own sins.
still waiting for Prager’s apology to the late, great Bob Grant (RIP) ...
her latest is pursuing Kamal’s descent. She turned up some interesting things, but whay did she even start? Because Kamla “messed” with Janet Jackson, apparently, and to quote “nobody messes with Janet Jackson”.
Right there, she plunged into loonville. No credibility.
RE: still waiting for Prager’s apology to the late, great Bob Grant (RIP) ...
Can you remind us why Prager owes Bob Grant an apology?
Owens has seemed on several occasions now to have a ‘problem’ with other women, all apart from politics.
There are women like that; they’re unpleasant, and healthy women stay away from them.
But I think her main problem is a mania for creating attention-getting controversy and ‘making waves’.
No matter how they are educated or how they were brought up, the majority of them will side with their race, not ideology. Owens is headed that direction.
Sure, Israel can be questioned. However, they have been under attack since 1948 when they got their little sliver of land. I stand by Israel!
The good news is we can still love the nation of Israel while hating pedophilia.
How is this possible? Simple—the two are not the same.
She’s gone against Black women, too, including Kimberly Klacik. (Klacik is running again now, so I wouldn’t put it past Owens to criticize her again.)
I think Owens just resents and harbors a lot of jealousy toward other females, especially those who gain some position in politics.
Meanwhile, why are posters either telling others not to pay attention to Candace Owens or otherwise assassinating her character?
Censorship and character assassination for its own sake are two of the most thoughtless things we can do (which is part of my reasoning for believing the cabal is low IQ).
What she says is wrong but has the right to say it. We agree on 90% which is a good starting point.
Why are you just accepting what Dennis Prager writes in his letter?
He gets to quote or paraphrase what Candace said without her being able to defend herself or explain what she actually meant.
Like the Adele song “Rumor Has It”. More profound words on this subject were never spoken.
“Just ‘cause I said it, it don’t mean that I meant it
People say crazy things
Just ‘cause I said it, don’t mean that I meant it
Just ‘cause you heard it”
Meaning that regardless of what I said, you can’t know what I really think/meant.
GREAT SONG!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgpInZ6OQ40&ab_channel=JoCarl12
Owens can defend herself any time she wants. She has a platform, just as Prager does.
“nobody messes with Janet Jackson”.
They’ll punish her at some point. Trump, Eric Adams, have you noticed how they make the live of those with prominent voices who challenge them into living Hells?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.