Heads - planned parenthood wins, tails - planned parenthood wins.
Heads - planned parenthood wins, tails - planned parenthood wins.
I suppose it could be 5-D chess, but...
If true, shame on her. LORD, please show her the truth.
Among other things, abortion-on-demand is self-inflicted genocide.
Is that OK through nine months and even after birth??
>> I have carried this belief with me throughout my entire adult life.
can a belief be aborted too?
It’s October, alright!
Melania ain’t on the ballot, but, nonetheless, this sucks. You can take the girl out of Commie-era Yugoslavia, but apparently you can’t take Commie-era Yugoslavia out of the girl.
.
If true that’s unfortunate, but I’m willing to wait until the book is out and see what she has to say for myself.
Four years of Odumbo followed by three of Mr. Potato Head with nothing but four years of Trump to punctuate in between it has made me a skeptic about anything anyone says.
If this is true, our nation deserves judgment more than ever.
She’s allowed to have her opinion but I disagree with her 1000 percent here abortion is murder period
Why would she do this at this critical time?
It doesn’t matter what the wife says. The candidate said there must be some form of punishment for women who get abortions.
And Nancy Reagan was pro-choice and relied on astrology through her time in the White House.
Laura Bush is also pro-choice.
Trump has ALWAYS been pro-choice, but he appoints constitution minded judges.
She is free to come to her own conclusions on the issues that are important to her and to use whatever platform she has access to in order to appeal to others. It's another case of the old adage "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
What's playing out right now is what I predicted would happen back in May 2022.
We are currently at step 2 of my predicted outcome.The worst thing about Roe v. Wade is that it allowed our politicians to hide behind the ruling for far too long. The issue needs to be debated, but the debate never happened as long as Roe was out there.
The blow to the left is about the ability to create rights in the Constitution. The "third party interest" is the key to the whole thing.
The Declaration of Independence says that our rights are inherent in each of us, and endowed upon us by our Creator. The Constitution guarantees to each of us these inherent rights.
I don't need the involvement of a third party to enjoy free speech, to publish, to congregate somewhere, to worship, or to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
I don't need the involvement of others to defend myself from harm.
I don't need the involvement of others to demand the privacy of my papers and possessions.
I don't need the involvement of others to have the right to confront my accusers.
But I do require the involvement of a third party to have an abortion performed on me. Once the third party is involved, there is a role for government regulations to play:
An abortion is not an inherent Constitutionally-protected right of the same kind as those listed above. If someone else must collaborate with me in order for it to happen, it is not a right, it is a transaction.
- Is this person qualified? Who else will assist?
- Is there a standard procedure to be followed, including post-abortion recovery?
- What tools will be used? How will they be cleaned?
- Where will it be performed?
- Is the location safe and clean?
- What will happen to the aborted fetus?
Justice Alito is simply saying that abortion does not rise to the level of a Constitutional right, and that the proper venue for society to deal with it is via the people through their state and federal legislative processes.
That's it.
Dredd Scott was a bad ruling because it violated the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (made moot by the 13th amendment).
Plessy v. Ferguson was overturned by Brown v. Board of Education because it violated the right to peaceably assemble.
With the overturning of Roe v. Wade, many of the invented rights (based on equal protection and nothing else) will be up for debate, meaning they must be inherent individual rights or societally agreed upon law via the legislative processes.
When Roe is reversed, three things will happen:
As long as Roe has been "settled law," it allowed the extremes to rule the middle. On the one hand was the "abortion any time" crowd that included day of birth (and sometimes the day after), and on the other hand was the "no abortion ever" under any circumstance group. Most people are somewhere in the middle of these two extremes.
- The debates will begin in the several states, as the states grapple with the issue.
- The people will eventually clamor for a national solution after the states create a patchwork of different laws.
- Congress will be forced to come up with single uniform solution to abortion.
They need to be heard, and the politicians need to be forced to listen and deal with it once and for all.
-PJ
Melania can believe as she wishes,but I still don’t get why she’s choosing right now. the last week’s before the election, to promote her book? After staying invisible and silent through out this year . She never showed up at any of her husbands trials this spring either.
Maybe Mooch was right. that Melania would prefer Kamala won.
I get that she would want to get her private life back, but of all times to get restless and rebellious.
Will God continue to Bless a nation that has abortion as its highest priority?
Half the country agrees with her.
The issue is now rightly with the individual states, and the people.
Medical procedures are under State control.
Thanks to our PDJT, The GOAT, the horror of Roe is gone
Want change? Convince your fellow Citizens.
It is not for the Courts or the Fed.
Terrific, another one who mocks God. What a disappointment she is.