Posted on 09/12/2024 12:25:05 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
John Solomon @jsolomonReports
Breaking: 'There will be no third debate': Trump ends talk of rematch with Harris From justthenews.com
2:19 PM · Sep 12, 2024
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
I think this all very confusing, but I think this is Trump saying he won’t debate her a third time in October. He already agreed to a September 25th debate on NBC, which Harris has not accepted. Time will tell.
I think all of these would be good: VDH, Mark Levin, Dennis Prager.
But there are a number of very sharp and pro-Trump people on FOX, too. (Levin himself has a show on FOX.)
True
But it would never happen.
Fox would assign Milquetoast anchors.
And Kameltoe would refuse.
It’s all a dream
“By stating he won’t do another, he is leading the campaign.”
The Trump campaign failed to lead by letting Harris put the offer out first, and forcing Trump to say no. This is a small win for Harris, just on campaign tactics.
We can’t let the mods ask the questions. Let each candidate take turns asking questions of the other.
Next she will do a town hall on Fox.
Beat it, troll.
I just do not trust Fox one bit. As “5Madman2” says in #43, “Fox would assign Milquetoast anchors.”
HUGE mistake.
Good move. Komrade Kamala won’t ever agree to a real debate; there’s nothing to be gained by wasting time on another leftist dog-and-pony show. We know full well what Willie’s girlfriend will do with both the pony and the dog.
Mr. Trump seems to do quite well getting his message across by bypassing the leftists in Big Media.
What bothers me is that if they DID agree to do a debate on Fox, then Fox would use the most liberal personalities that they have to run it, and it’d be the ABC debate with a Fox bug in the corner of the screen.
Good move—why let Harris have another PR advertisement? Events are going to catch up with the election.
Yes, the "moderators" acted like PR people for Kamala. But I contend that just about anybody who would be swayed by that are people who would have already been swayed by the constant MSM's similar biased "reporting" on the television and in social media feeds. So even if it was frustrating to watch, in the end I'm not sure the "moderators" impacted many votes.
The question is: of the people who wouldn't be impacted by the moderators and were still neutral or gently leaning one way or the other, how many of those voters did Trump pull his way vs how many did Kamala pull her way?
FOX cares primarily about Ukraine money.
Kamala guarantees forever War money.
+ Huge Govt Spending and largesse
Good move in my opinion
Most people have short memories & will forget the ABC & Kamala vs Trump debate
Hammer the airwaves with all of the videos of her flip flops
Ads showing what inflation & the border looked like under Trump
To avoid the inevitable Democrat and media narrative that Trump is afraid to debate her again, it would probably have been better to reinforce the fact that the first 2 debates were held on her media territory, particularly with the second one so incredibly biased, by suggesting he wants her to reciprocate by allowing him to choose the network and sign off on the moderator, She would, of course, decline
I don’t know if that’s the case.
He will find out if she is desperate or not. If she is, he can have another debate at the time, location, and moderators of his choice...
Paul Ryan wouldn’t have it any other way.
Bad PR.
Looks like he is scared
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.