Posted on 08/31/2024 10:09:56 PM PDT by hardspunned
Resign @GovTimWalz Tampon Tim! Video surfaced with Tim Walz claiming “when I was in Afghanistan”! Tim Walz should resign in disgrace! He was NEVER in Afghanistan! Liar!
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
Did he imply he was there in combat or later visiting as Governor?
Congressman.
LOL!
What an effin tard...
Probably deep fake.../S
I am not a Walz fan, but he’s not lying about being in Afghanistan. He went as a congressman. If he’s saying he was there in a military capacity, then he is lying.
He fits right in with the lying, cheating, scum, demonicrats. They all lie.
He is always seething with anger. President Trump is a happy warrior. Ronald Reagan was a happy warrior. Even Minnesotan Hubert Humphrey was a happy warrior. But Walz is a mental case with anger management problems.
He scowls with those humongous Walrus jaws of his. He almost yanks his son's arm off, scowling like he's ready to chew the boy out. Walz's wife looks away, almost cowering, desperately unhappy, and wishing she were somewhere far, far away. Poor thing.
I suspect after Walz and Khlamydia lose this November, Mrs Walz will take a hike. I can't imagine that they share a bed. Uggh. Sleeping next to a walrus. I hope to God that they sleep in separate bedrooms. I bet that lard ass snores like a dying walrus. With any luck sleep apnea will pay him its final visit.
“Politicians are the lowest form of life, Democrats are the lowest form of politician”- General George S. Patton
Nothing in the video indicates that he said he was there as a member of the military.
Walz repeatedly, purposefully, and artfully references Iraq and Afghanistan or carrying arm in the context of violence, PTSD, and such like here … all with the conscious intent to leave listeners with the clear inference that he has sand in his boots and was tested under fire.
WALZ the WEASEL.
I looked it up.
He actually was in Afghanistan as a Congressman.
Simple.
Socialists/communists are inherently angry. The status quo is always oppresive and anything not communist fits that category, and must be fought to destroy and replace with socialism via the Dialectic process. The dialectic process always has one side as evil/oppressive. Therefore they are perpetually angry forever, since its impossible to ever be done and bring about true communism.
Does it make a difference? Has he ever been there?
Never mind. It appears that he has been there.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4262048/posts?page=12#12
He didn’t exactly lie… he inferred he served there, but never said he did. He is a complete POS beta cuck stolen valor commie though.
What did he blame his lies on? Incorrect grammar or some such. Lying POS. He had a perfectly honorable history of service. And he STILL has to lie. Trump has been to Afghanistan more than tampon Tim. And I recall some POS, maybe Chomo Biden, claimed Trump never went.
WAT! A lying hypocritical Democrat? Nooo way! /s
“ Did he imply he was there in combat or later visiting as Governor?”
That you have to ask this question gives you the answer. Why would you look to defend him?
Please watch “the outpost” or “korengal” if you haven’t been in the military
Realize that this guy implied that he was there taking part in combat when he said he wants to get rid of rifles like the ones he used in combat to an audience on video
He says “when I was in Afghanistan”. I was in Connecticut this summer. I say when I was away or when I was at my sisters or when I was at the beach. Or when I was visiting Connecticut Maybe I can say when I was in Connecticut but I didn’t
When a military person says ‘when I was in Afghanistan, or Iraq, the sandbox, the desert, Viet Nam, Nam, Saudi, downrange, deployed, they took part in combat or they’re stealing valor.
And you know it.
When a congressperson or a celeb says ‘when I was visiting troops in Afghanistan that’s what he means. If there’s any question it is because the guy talking is bullshitting
It has been determined that this guy is putting down all service members by lying about having served in combat, making it out to be less honorable to have not served in combat. It is not.
Or restrepo
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.