Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Now to top it, why not also propose the elimination of the death ( or estate ) tax?
1 posted on 08/13/2024 10:34:54 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: SeekAndFind

2 posted on 08/13/2024 10:39:52 AM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Basically wants to turn social security from a 401K to a Roth IRA.


3 posted on 08/13/2024 10:39:53 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

He could also think about eliminating the social security death benefit. $240 doesn’t help much anyway.


4 posted on 08/13/2024 10:42:33 AM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

“Critics argue that eliminating the tax could reduce government revenues by $1.8 trillion over the next decade.”

A reminder that Xiden dreadfully overspent and piled about that amount on the federal debt in 200 days and our uniparty congress gave him the money to do so.


5 posted on 08/13/2024 10:43:11 AM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

You can’t be serious about the national debt, or even the annual deficit, without reforming and reducing entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare. Any proposal that ignores these is just more political fluff.


6 posted on 08/13/2024 10:45:24 AM PDT by Bob Wills is still the king (Just a Texas Playboy at heart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Get rid of those damn property taxes too my mom pays 18,000 for her house


7 posted on 08/13/2024 10:46:19 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
”They would have to explain why a tax break for Social Security was acceptable when proposed by Democrats in the past but suddenly becomes unpalatable when Trump suggests it.”

That one’s exceedingly simple, though it would force the dems to be honest: “Trump said it, so we’re again’ it.”

8 posted on 08/13/2024 10:46:53 AM PDT by cross_bearer_02
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

With this proposal and eliminating tax on tips, you could fire the 87,000 IRS agents so that they can get real, tax-paying jobs in the private sector.


10 posted on 08/13/2024 10:52:05 AM PDT by Empire_of_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Two things happened to Social Security- both done by a@@hole demoncrats.

1.) The first, done by LBJ(!!) was to count the Social Security Trust Fund INTO the General Revenue funds of the United States, in order to balance the “budge” in the face of Great Society handouts. This was a criminal act and Congress went along with it as another “handout” empowerment.
SO— This should STOP right away. Make the government function on ACTUAL taxes from the world of commerce, and not pilfer retirement funding. Dramatic effect on the jackasses out spending using borrowed money from the Fed Reserve and paying it back from General Revenue (which includes SS Trust Fund).
2.) Bill Clinton/dems began taxing Social Security as a)income, as a “taxable amount from a table/calculation) and b) reducing payout of Social Security by a monthly premium for Medicare— paid OUT OF THE Social Security Trust Fund!! and now Medicare is monumentally going bankrupt because of all the “yahoooo!” billable items rolled into medicare, and the premium goes UP every year since, along with so called Medicare Advantage plans supposedly “offsetting” the monthly premium paid by people on Social Security.

Trump does all this and stops any taxation of Social Security retirement benefits— and our government will HAVE to have a budget like everyone else has to watch spending every day vs. income revenue. Mark Levin asks the question every time— “how much money does the Fed gov take in a month in revenue” and “as such the govt. MUST pay debt obligations,and always has had enough to do so— if it would not spend the revenue away on political pet new items of handout and redistribution” This is the way the big LIE we will go “bankrupt and not pay our national debts” — because the Treasury deliberately does NOT pay the national debt FIRST, and then screams it needs to borrow from... The Federal Reserve Bank (a private bank, btw).

This is how, even pilfering from the SS Trust Fund (where is the Trust Fund? The joke horribly true is that it is in a data center in West Virginia, full of I0Us from the US Govt) the US govt is 100 Trillion in unpayable, unfunded liabilities.


11 posted on 08/13/2024 10:54:24 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Analysts and regular people, often overlook the fact that, cutting taxes, no matter from where, allows people to keep more of their money, and more money in people’s pockets means more spending into the economy and more economic activity. More economic activity, especially by consumers, means more people working and more earnings that could be taxed, thereby generating more tax revenue for government than what was lost with the tax cutting.

The ‘loss’ of $1.8 trillion over 10 years would easily be overshadowed by larger amount of tax revenue collected from the higher economic activity. The tax cuts to not go into a hole never to be seen again; that money is reinvested by consumers to generate a lot more income and a lot more tax revenue. Same with the -no-taxes on tips policy, where government estimates the ‘loss’ of some $220 billion over 10 years, All those tax cuts end up generating more in taxes in the long run, than the amounts that were cut in the first place.

Also notice that, when it comes to making tax cuts seem too high and unworkable, the estimates are for 10 years, making people wary of letting those cuts happen. Those tax cuts should be calculated for each year, which would make them more palatable and acceptable to normal folks. Scare tactics work, but they are also very hurtful.


17 posted on 08/13/2024 11:04:19 AM PDT by adorno (CCH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Trump’s proposal is do good it would elect anybody living or dead. But he had the smarts to sponsor it first in this election. He’s actually quite politically astute


20 posted on 08/13/2024 11:09:39 AM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians aren't born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The first time I understood that social security payouts were taxable was quite a shock for me. It’s outrageous to think we would be taxed on the very money that we spent our entire working lives paying into.

Keep in mind I fully understand that any payout I get is not “my money” since this entire system is a Ponzi scheme and any money I had put in has been spent many times over...

Of course the liberal left see many people collecting social security that ALSO saved for retirement beyond social security as “rich and wealthy” and hence expect them to be taxed for their good behavior!!


23 posted on 08/13/2024 11:17:18 AM PDT by visually_augmented (I was blind, but now I see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Three, two, one...how long before Kackles adopts this too?


24 posted on 08/13/2024 11:19:00 AM PDT by lula (1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

All great objectives, although the path to victory boils down to: “It’s the border, the economy and foreign entanglements, stupid!” (of course I am in no way referring to you, S&F! Cheers!)


30 posted on 08/13/2024 11:30:01 AM PDT by glennaro (2024: The Year of The Reckoning, lest our Republic succumb to the "progressive" disease of the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Eliminating taxes on Social Security would win the election hands down. Lots of females collecting SS who vote and aren’t worried about a federal law on abortion.


31 posted on 08/13/2024 11:32:04 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Unless and until the US STOPS SPENDING cutting taxes is not going to work.


32 posted on 08/13/2024 11:35:50 AM PDT by redgolum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

We already paid tax on SS when we were working. Now we pay tax for up to 85% of it again, depending on our “wealth”.


37 posted on 08/13/2024 12:08:25 PM PDT by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The left will just (promise to) steal it, like they did the tax on tips.

(promise to, then renege)


40 posted on 08/13/2024 12:36:09 PM PDT by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Finish the damned WALL! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

If focus groups say it’s a winning issue, Kamala will also come out for it, and two weeks later the media will have convinced most people it was her idea to begin with.


41 posted on 08/13/2024 1:00:30 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Interestingly enough, there were no income taxes on Social Security before the 1980s.

It happened while Reagan was president, but I'm pretty sure it was not his idea.

43 posted on 08/13/2024 1:06:52 PM PDT by Salman (It's not a slippery slope if it was part of the program all along. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson