The gun control angle is of course expected from the despicable dems, but there is an easy way to shut that nonsense down, and not a single Republican has thought of it. Here it is: If the Secret Service’s protective plan can be pierced by a lowly AR-15 wielded by a local 20 year old kid, then how are they supposed to defend their “protectees” against sophisticated state bad actors, terrorists, etc. equipped with much heavier weaponry like rocket launchers, IEDs, etc.? The dems are trying to give the impression that if we just eliminated “evil” “assault weapons”, then the President could ride around in a convertible in complete safety. The reality is that of all the threats they are SUPPOSED to be prepared to defend against, small caliber rifles should be at the lower end of that spectrum. The design of “The Beast” certainly indicates so.
The other point that should be made is that regardless of the type of weaponry possessed by a bad guy, the priority must always be to STOP the threat before they are able to use their weapon. That makes the specific type of weapon far less important than the dems are trying to make out.
the funniest one was Connolly who got really mad about guns and then ended with his office being attacked....by a baseball bat
Raskin at it again. Wish someone would ask him what AR stands for.
Another question they could ask is: What does AR stand for? Simple and make them look stupid.