Posted on 07/15/2024 4:37:14 AM PDT by xzins
Democrat Senator Kamala Harris (CA) could be in for an unwelcome campaign surprise if she faces a constitutional eligibility challenge to her bid for the presidency.
(Excerpt) Read more at drrichswier.com ...
 Hey! FReepers! Help Fill The Tank! How About It? Huh? It Ain't Askin' Too Much Ya Know.... Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
O’Dummy wasn’t born in ‘Murica but that didn’t stop the DNC from getting him installed. And, he’s still running things. What’s that tell you?
And she was allowed to poss as vp to the fake president that was installed in 2021.?
Only fitting!
Spit,,,
the pres qualifications is the same for vp.......
Silly doctor…those laws only apply to Conservatives.
If that’s true and you say that... you will be accused of supposedly “racism.” Lol
Sometimes things are decided by courts. And sometimes things are decided by public opinion. Obama was elected president in 2008 and re-elected in 2012. Harris was elected VP in 2020. Both people had eligibility problems. But the public decided. Both were eligible.
So unfortunately, case closed. No court will touch it now. There’s not even a 1% chance of that happening. Don’t get me wrong! It makes for an interesting discussion. But that’s it.
Here’s another example. Among other things, a person must have resided in the United States for 14 years to be eligible for the presidency. In 1928 Herbert Hoover ran for president. He had resided in the US for 14 years, but not for the last 14 (he was overseas doing relief work).
There was some question as to Hoover’s eligibility. The public decided. Hoover was elected.
Since the election of Hussein Obama NBC is irrelevant. Anyone on earth is now able to run for US President. Practically speaking one would have to be at least a long time- a year say- resident to get any traction, at present at least, but there are actually no citizenship barriers anymore. The Court refuses to rule on it.
Her website hid or removed the information from which her ineligibility was alkarrnt. Thus occurred when she was arkk my extend fur Veep, the cjj on bstituruinsl standard for veep and potus being the same.
However, the difference is that many democrats now need a means of removing her. So, they could have a motive for seeing this now as the excuse they were looking for.
That was way too technical for me!
Neither was Obama.
Yep. But many democrats want to get rid of her.
Good point!
But most democrats didn’t want to get rid of obama. Different story either harris.
With harris... correction last post
Things are so bad for the dems that they may have to set off their October surprise next month.
The question of whether or not “Que mala” Harris is a “Natural born citizen” should have been determined BEFORE she was elevated to the Vice Presidency. Apparently the claim of “Natural born” has been expanded to mean any child born on the soil of the United States of legal resident alien parents (and apparently of ILLEGAL resident alien parents as well), on the doctrine of “Jus soli”, based on the land of birth. The doctrine of “Jus sanguinis”, the birthright by blood of either or both of the parents who are themselves natural-born or naturalized citizens, would appear to have a superior claim, but this fine point has never been adjudicated.
I have bookmarked this as it looks definitive.
as was Obama, Rubio, Haley, Vivek and so on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.