Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 07/13/2024 2:02:52 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The campaign involves a powerful network of Republican lawyers and activist groups, working loosely in concert with the Republican National Committee. Many of the key players were active in Mr. Trump’s attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
But unlike the chaotic and improvised challenge four years ago, the new drive includes a systematic search for any vulnerability in the nation’s patchwork election system.
Mr. Trump’s allies have followed a two-pronged approach: restricting voting for partisan advantage ahead of Election Day and short-circuiting the process of ratifying the winner afterward, if Mr. Trump loses. The latter strategy involves an ambitious — and legally dubious — attempt to reimagine decades of settled law dictating how results are officially certified in the weeks before the transfer of power.
At the heart of the strategy is a drive to convince voters that the election is about to be stolen, even without evidence. Democrats use mail voting, drop boxes and voter registration drives to swing elections, they have argued. And Mr. Trump’s indictments and criminal conviction are a Biden administration gambit to interfere with the election, they claim.
“As things stand right now, there’s zero chance of a free and fair election,” Mike Howell, a project director at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, said at an event this week. “I’m formally accusing the Biden administration of creating the conditions that most reasonable policymakers and officials cannot in good conscience certify an election.”
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
The New York Times is a specious news source. Every word it publishes is either a lie or projection. Article presented for entertainment purposes only.
Translation from NYT speak:
They have the audacity to want a fair election!!!
You really love your New York Times, don’t ya.
Is this the 3rd or 4th time today you’ve posted Slimes Crap here.
People are watching you. (sniff)
Hate-filled little devil, aren't ya?
If you want me to stop posting, just say so and you will never hear from me again and this place will die just a little bit faster.
Anyone who opposes cleaning up elections automatically favors cheating. No middle ground.
"Falsely".
I used to like journalism that just told me what was happening and didn't try to tell me what it all meant.
Consent decree is history, Trumps daughter-in-law not Mitten’s niece is in charge, and she is raising an army of 100,000 election monitors who will be onsite in real-time for the first time since 1982..
It’s a new ball game.
What ARE you on about? You’ve been here since 1998 and yet you’re threatening to opus out?
Because of ME snarking at ya?
Take a break from FR FRiend. I’ve done it many times. It’ll clear your mind from silly stuff like this.
Whatever - I will now leave you alone.
What’s crooked is the totally corrupted justice system which will never accept as proof of a steal the raw evidence everyone has that illegal aliens have had their names added to the voting rolls in almost every U.S. city at migrant centers by employees of NGO’s who will fill out the vote-by-mail ballots and mail them in. And that these aliens arrived on plane flights originating at the Southern border which flights were scheduled and paid for by the feds themselves with taxpayers’ dollars. That’s what all of those planeloads overnight have been about and still are. So the STEAL will look REAL when the numbers are put together. Bastards.
Helocopter list.
They’re cheating right now as we chat.
I don’t want you to post any more NYT articles.
Wow, the Times has opened every floodgate.
You know, you don’t have to click on them.
Re: 4 - good grief.
The poster is not breaking any forum rules.
Do better.
I don’t take orders from you.
If you want me to stop posting, I will, but if I continue posting I will post anything I want and the moderator can delete it if it is inappropriate.’
What’s it like being a hate-filled little devil?
>> The New York Times is a specious news source.
I’d go with blatantly deceitful
This NYT article I posted today got 143 comments and counting:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4250883/posts
But you think just because you don't like something, nobody else should be allowed to see it. How woke of you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.