Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Houthis Mark July 4: ‘U.S. Aircraft Carriers Are an Obsolete Weapons System’
Breitbart ^ | 07/05/2024 | FRANCES MARTEL

Posted on 07/05/2024 9:42:48 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

The head of the Yemeni Ansarallah terrorist organization, Abdul-Malik al-Houthi, boasted in a national address on Thursday that his jihadists had turned American aircraft carriers into “obsolete weapons.”

Houthi’s group, which controls the Yemeni capital of Sana’a and received significant backing from state sponsor of terror Iran, declared war on Israel in October in support of fellow jihadist terrorists Hamas. The Houthis’, as they are commonly known, main contribution to terrorism in the Middle East has been a campaign against commercial shipping in the Red Sea in which they use drones, missiles, and other often rudimentary weapons to attack random civilian vessels in the region. The campaign has resulted in skyrocketing shipping fees and the collapse of toll revenue at the Suez Canal in Egypt as many companies choose to redirect ships around the Cape of Good Hope in Africa.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: aircraft; houthis; july4; navy; obsolete; pirates; redsea; yemen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: ChicagoConservative27

All Russia has to do is give Houthis hypersonic missiles. Seems fair enough, since the US gives Ukraine missiles to strike Russian territory. And since the US says they are not responsible for what Ukraine does with our missiles, surly Russia is not responsible for what Yemen does with their missiles either. There is no defense against hypersonic missiles.


21 posted on 07/05/2024 10:49:48 AM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

In the Ukraine and the Gaza wars military observers have noted that only a tiny sample of modern technological, now outdated weaponry, has been deployed. The real danger is that the Pentagon is run by Battleship Admirals and Calvary Generals who are supported by defense industry special interests and the politicos that have been bought. It will be brave, young irreplaceable people who will die. Would you really want someone you cared deeply about on a naval surface combatant, a land armored vehicle or a helicopter if there was a real 21st century world war between superpowers? Do you really believe that the overall strategies now deployed to defend and secure America are correct and effective? A geek behind a console in a bunker may determine the future,


22 posted on 07/05/2024 10:56:45 AM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: allendale

” Do you really believe that the overall strategies now deployed to defend and secure America are correct and effective?”

I’d hope those strategies are under review and redevelopment. I agree that the people who survive to reach the top in militaries and governments are usually those who have made the right alliances rather than those who are best suited to the job. Thus, it is and always has been. The only reason they change the way they think, and act, is for their personal survival in their jobs. If the average general today thinks about the lives of his men, it’s only because losing them might affect his position. (I base this assessment on the number of retired asshole ship captains, army colonels and majors I’ve worked for.) The fact we have in government an admiral who is a man made up to look like a particularly ugly woman sends shivers down my spine. Even if “it” is only running the nation’s medical establishment. What “it” conveys to me is how far off the rails our leadership has gone.


23 posted on 07/05/2024 11:12:55 AM PDT by Gen.Blather (Wait! I said that out loud? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

IMO the neon-cons are enabling them to continue warring.

and the hate America contingent while self acclaiming to be opposed to war are like fish on a hook, denigrating our military and in essence becoming mouthpieces for the neo cons.


24 posted on 07/05/2024 11:59:36 AM PDT by Freest Republican (There is no tyranny that cannot be justified by imbeciles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Aircraft carriers have been “obsolete” already for 20 years or more.

But what do you mean by “obsolete”?

A tank can easily over run an infantry soldier so infantry is obsolete?

A tank can easily be taken out by an air craft with ground attack capabilities so tanks are obsolete?

Aircraft really suck at controlling territory, only boots can do that.

Its like a giant game of rock, paper, scissors and from time to time someone comes up with something that “beats everything” at least for awhile until some kid comes up with something else.

They havent been the king for a good while.

What bothers me most about these discussions are those that claim that aircraft carriers still serve a purpose as far as deterrence. Those people are idiots or preprogramming you for what they have planned.

If I did intend to get into a war with you then an aircraft carrier has enough power that Im going to hit it in the first waves of attacks if I can reach it.

And that is exactly what they want. 6000 sailors gone...NOW!

The withering attacks by the overwhelming POWER of the Vietnamese Navy! Remember the Maine!

Its so predictable that there is a guy on Youtube that to a significant degree has built his channel on the meme that the United States wipes out countries for “Touching our boats”.

You dont honestly believe that crap about Pearl Harbor do you?


25 posted on 07/05/2024 12:16:05 PM PDT by gnarledmaw (Hivemind liberals worship leaders, sovereign conservatives select servants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Al Houthi is right. We have a brain dead commander in chief who takes naps all day. Naval Commanders cannot do a damn thing that he doesn’t approve.

Don’t blame the carrier Mr. Al Houthi, if Ronald Reagan was in charge of that aircraft carrier, you would be dead.


26 posted on 07/05/2024 12:25:28 PM PDT by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Its a matter or technology and higher ground. A surface navy is a concept long past viability.

Surface aircraft carriers have been demoted to second wave ground support.

No you havent seen submersible air superiority drone carriers and no one has sunk an American carrier. The key word is YET.

The fact that Japan and Germany were defeated in the manner they were to a significant degree was because of their belief in the power of the obsolete battleship. It was at that time still a matter of YET.

China is believed to be recently weaponizing space and Russia is said to have been doing so for a good while. No surface vessel, not even those platforms capable of anti-satellite weaponry, are going to be able to overcome the advantage of that high ground.

Their only purpose at the front of a conflict is to get killed and force us into full blown conflict.


27 posted on 07/05/2024 12:37:10 PM PDT by gnarledmaw (Hivemind liberals worship leaders, sovereign conservatives select servants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: suthener

The Navy could stop the shipping attacks with the right ROEs.


28 posted on 07/05/2024 12:55:36 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Israel, in order: https://freerepublic.com/tag/unclemiltieadventure/index)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

If you’re getting maggots, sell them to Bill Gates. He’s doing a new maggot based milk.


29 posted on 07/05/2024 1:00:33 PM PDT by spacewarp (Want freedom? Reject Dems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
A few well-placed nukes would render the Houthis obsolete extinct.
30 posted on 07/05/2024 2:09:20 PM PDT by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Finish the damned WALL! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

31 posted on 07/05/2024 5:30:41 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What are their FR nicks?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Fire on one and find out the facts.

FAFO or prove yourself.


32 posted on 07/05/2024 7:33:20 PM PDT by If You Want It Fixed - Fix It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gnarledmaw

The DRFM-based airborne electronic attack technology can confuse enemy radar DRFM also can modulate captured pulse data in amplitude, frequency, and phase to provide other affects. DRFM also can replay captured radar pulses many times to project several different false radar images. The Mercury Airborne 1225 advanced DRFM electronic warfare (EW) jammer can also produces coherent deception radar jamming by replaying a captured radar pulse with a small delay, which makes the target appear to move. The enemy will deplete their arsenal shooting at a false target.


33 posted on 07/05/2024 11:00:20 PM PDT by jonrick46 (Leftniks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

If Trump was president that aircraft carrier and assorted support ships would have destroyed the enemy.


34 posted on 07/06/2024 12:58:11 AM PDT by minnesota_bound (Need more money to buy everything now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gnarledmaw

“A surface navy is a concept long past viability.”

I don’t agree.

“Surface aircraft carriers have been demoted to second wave ground support.”

Not true. Aricraft carriers are as the name implies - floating arsenals of attack aircraft with their own airstrip. They have in most recent times delivered missile fire power from those aircraft, not only in “grond support” but also on targets where we had no ground operation. With aircraft carriers we supplement lacks of ground airbases, and I repeat, they have the arms & means to defend themselves very well, including anti-missile abilities.

That said, they do need to cintinue to update their abilities.


35 posted on 07/06/2024 9:49:18 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson