Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
To: SeekAndFind
Simple answer.
BOTH
So he is immune.
To: SeekAndFind
She sounds like a technocrat. imo
3 posted on
07/02/2024 1:48:22 PM PDT by
laplata
(They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
To: SeekAndFind
Amy is turning out to be somewhat of a disappointment.
4 posted on
07/02/2024 1:48:43 PM PDT by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: SeekAndFind
But also they nerfed all J6 cases too.
5 posted on
07/02/2024 1:48:50 PM PDT by
for-q-clinton
(Cancel Culture IS fascism...Let's start calling it that!)
To: SeekAndFind
Counter fulcrum: When Biden authorized the flying of illegal aliens (against US law) was he within his official capacity?
6 posted on
07/02/2024 1:49:01 PM PDT by
taxcontrol
(The choice is clear - either live as a slave on your knees or die as a free citizen on your feet.)
To: SeekAndFind
He was doing it as both POTUS and a candidate.
7 posted on
07/02/2024 1:49:03 PM PDT by
PghBaldy
(12/14/12 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15/12 - 1030am - Obama team scouts photo-op locations.)
To: SeekAndFind
Since when is questioning a vote count something you can prosecute a person for?
8 posted on
07/02/2024 1:49:07 PM PDT by
dforest
( )
To: SeekAndFind
More deep thinking from Amy Conehead Barrett.
This is up there with her deciding the FBI/DHS/CIA having offices inside social media companies, giving them a daily list of what they want blocked, and people banned was not “censorship”.
She was picked for her sex, now we have to pay the price for 30 more years at least. At least now we know why her tablet was empty in the hearings.
10 posted on
07/02/2024 1:49:49 PM PDT by
DesertRhino
(2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
To: SeekAndFind
Not so. President was speaking to Americans on an important issue in his role as President. He has an obligation to inform the public. The SC covered this by specifying that the Presidents motivations cannot be inquired into. The presumption is for official duties.
12 posted on
07/02/2024 1:50:23 PM PDT by
JayGalt
(DEI = Didn’t Earn It)
To: SeekAndFind
What a ham for attention! She was enamored to show her blank notepad she’s determined to always be an outlier. So they can be stealing an election right from under you, and you aren’t allowed to say anything!
14 posted on
07/02/2024 1:50:45 PM PDT by
RushingWater
(Thank God for no more mean tweets, it's worth 30% inflation. )
To: SeekAndFind
I sure as hell hope if Trump gets back into the White House, he will get his list of SCOTUS nominees from the Heritage Foundation, and not a RINO like The Turtle (who will not be the leader then but y'all know what I mean).
ACB is a huge disappointment, but at least it's better than RBG or Merrick Garland, if Obama had been able to appoint him.
To: SeekAndFind
The idiot. She has found a way to unleash a whole new wave of litigation.
Another Souter.
18 posted on
07/02/2024 1:51:12 PM PDT by
DesertRhino
(2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
To: SeekAndFind
I like this reply, regarding the author of this piece ... telling ...
Old Gyrene
11 hours ago
“…for those aiming to hold Trump accountable.”
If you had put this phrase up front, I wouldn’t have wasted ten seconds reading your diatribe.
You ever get an urge to hold the clintons, obama, or biden accountable?
Yeah, didn’t think so.
19 posted on
07/02/2024 1:51:53 PM PDT by
Jane Long
(The role of the GOP: to write sharply-worded letters as America becomes a communist hell-hole.)
To: SeekAndFind
There is nothing illegal about questioning the authenticity of an election. Especially when the poll watchers are kicked out, and 300,000 ballots magically appear at 3am and all count for 1 candidate with no down ballot casting.
22 posted on
07/02/2024 1:52:50 PM PDT by
Mr. Mohasky
(Common sense in a world lacking any, will be perceived & construed as an extreme point of view.)
To: SeekAndFind
Bigger question. Is it illegal to question the vote count?
23 posted on
07/02/2024 1:53:25 PM PDT by
pas
To: SeekAndFind
What difference does it make stupid.
This election integrity thing needs full daylighting. Let is talk about the STEAL in some court or another, what are you robed dudes so skeered of or are you on the take?
24 posted on
07/02/2024 1:53:32 PM PDT by
Recompennation
(Don’t blame me my vote didn’t counb)
To: SeekAndFind
Vote theft is definitely a Presidential concern.
28 posted on
07/02/2024 1:56:48 PM PDT by
Nateman
(Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
To: SeekAndFind
She works overtime to construct the scenario that he would not have immunity, when the same energy could be used to say that he does.
To: SeekAndFind
Interesting that in a 6-3 decision the other day, Amy "Li'l Chilluns" voted with the Leftist
minority, while the Black lady voted with Conservative majority. Interesting times.
33 posted on
07/02/2024 1:59:13 PM PDT by
Governor Dinwiddie
(LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
To: SeekAndFind
What could be more official than ensuring the integrity of elections?
34 posted on
07/02/2024 1:59:45 PM PDT by
bigbob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson