Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: Red Badger
The law shouldn’t tell us what opinions to hold, any more than it should tell us what pronouns to use.
32 posted on
07/01/2024 6:56:35 AM PDT by
Spok
To: Red Badger
How did District Judges get the power to establish what laws are legal for the whole country. Maybe that’s why Biden ignores some of their judgements.
To: Red Badger
Montana judge violates the Montana State Constitution.
First Montana judge to openly identify as homosexual.
No count the judge is invoking personal views not law void ruling.
35 posted on
07/01/2024 7:16:38 AM PDT by
Vaduz
To: Red Badger
Show me they don’t have Y chromosomes and then we’ll talk.
36 posted on
07/01/2024 7:27:14 AM PDT by
bgill
(.)
To: Red Badger; woodpusher
Montana Judge Strikes Down Law Clarifying There Are Only 2 Sexes Another idiot judge making the legal system look like a collection of wackadoodles.
38 posted on
07/01/2024 7:50:11 AM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: Red Badger
The mental gymnastics of this judge is truly impressive.
39 posted on
07/01/2024 7:52:39 AM PDT by
taxcontrol
(The choice is clear - either live as a slave on your knees or die as a free citizen on your feet.)
To: Red Badger
40 posted on
07/01/2024 8:30:47 AM PDT by
aquila48
(Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how they control you. )
To: Red Badger
Vannata, you may be the judge (how could good folks of Montana elect him?), but an idiot nonetheless!
41 posted on
07/01/2024 8:33:25 AM PDT by
exinnj
To: Red Badger
the first Montana judge to openly identify as homosexual He's insane ... no wonder he issued an insane ruling.
43 posted on
07/01/2024 9:00:49 AM PDT by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: Red Badger
I think this reveals a bit more how they are unable to serve the constituents equally. Once they get into office, they only see through the focal point of LGBTQ………. It’s not what is good for us, it is what is good for me!
45 posted on
07/01/2024 9:43:07 AM PDT by
grame
(May you know more of the love of God Almighty this day!)
To: Red Badger
48 posted on
07/01/2024 10:06:14 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(joesbucks is back. Let's remedy that! 😁)
To: Red Badger
Pay NO attention.. just ANOTHER A$$HOLE JUDGE!
To: Red Badger
“the first Montana judge to openly identify as homosexual,”
Of course.
51 posted on
07/01/2024 12:15:19 PM PDT by
Organic Panic
(Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
To: Red Badger
Hey judge, can males get abortions?
52 posted on
07/01/2024 5:20:52 PM PDT by
minnesota_bound
(Need more money to buy everything now)
To: Red Badger
Vannatta further wrote, “The State does not address the fact that ‘sex’ has more than one definition. … The title does not indicate that the body of the Bill provides a common definition for ‘sex,’ meaning ‘gender,’ and not ‘sex’ meaning ‘sexual intercourse.’
Does the judge cite any example in the legal codes where the word sex refers to sexual intercourse?
53 posted on
07/03/2024 8:11:04 AM PDT by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson