To: Reno89519
I would say that Kamala could get into Barack’s good graces by doing what she does best, but I think we’re all pretty sure Barack doesn’t roll that way.
8 posted on
06/28/2024 10:20:31 AM PDT by
nesnah
(Infringe - act so as to limit or undermine [something]; encroach on)
To: nesnah; Reno89519
>
...Kamala could get into Barack’s good graces by doing what she does best, but I think we’re all pretty sure Barack doesn’t roll that way... Nice two-fer!
There just ain't enough popcorn in the world for this one!
16 posted on
06/28/2024 10:24:46 AM PDT by
dayglored
(Strange Women Lying In Ponds Distributing Swords! Arthur Pendragon in 2024)
To: nesnah
Even if he did roll that way I doubt Kamala is high on his list of available satisfiers.
If he wanted a parade of mistresses/concubines he would have them.
29 posted on
06/28/2024 10:31:19 AM PDT by
buwaya
(Strategic imperatives )
To: nesnah
I would say that Kamala could get into Barack’s good graces by doing what she does bestYEs but advertisements for facilitating medications warn against doing so if his doctor doesn't feel it is safe for him to engage in such activities.
42 posted on
06/28/2024 10:36:31 AM PDT by
fso301
To: nesnah
44 posted on
06/28/2024 10:37:22 AM PDT by
llevrok
(“In a time of deceit telling, the truth is a revolutionary act.” ― George Orwell)
To: nesnah
>I would say that Kamala could get into Barack’s good graces by doing what she does best, but I think we’re all pretty sure Barack doesn’t roll that way.<
Would that even matter? A ho-down is a ho-down. Anyway you can get it. ;- ))))
To: nesnah
Hell hath no fury as a woman scorned.
110 posted on
06/28/2024 12:23:50 PM PDT by
griswold3
(Truth, Beauty and Goodness. )
To: nesnah
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson