Posted on 06/27/2024 10:05:44 AM PDT by Kazan
I haven’t seen anyone asking serious questions about North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum. Instead, those in charge of vetting Donald Trump’s potential vice presidential pick seem to be relying on voters’ impressions of an affable Midwest guy. But some North Dakotans who know better can’t stand the thought of Bill Gates’ friend anywhere near the White House.
To be fair, Burgum, a top surrogate for Trump, has a super cool self-made-man story. Chimney sweep, bet the farm and won, worked his way up and became friends with his boss at Microsoft, sold his company for $1.1 billion and stayed on to help things along.
The problem is with the vetting.
It would be nice to have confidence that the vetting went beyond mere Wiki searches and phone calls to people who have been employed by the guy.
He seems folksy. Genuine. He wore jeans to his inauguration and emceed the event himself like a Ted Talk.
Burgum’s Record During Covid
But why doesn’t anyone ask how he really did in his state during Covid? South Dakota and Florida governors’ performances were certainly pored over, but Burgum gets a pass.
He financed and promoted a tracking app for North Dakotans with Covid. One month after the Covid panic hit the state, Burgum announced a partnership with the North Dakota Department of Health and an in-state developer known for creating the Bison Tracker app. He repeatedly pushed the people of his state to use Care19, an app that “more efficiently and effectively” identified people who might have been in contact with others who had tested positive.
I doubt President Trump would be thrilled by these surveillance efforts.
Burgum’s Lack of Endorsement
Burgum has always taken his own path. He’s definitely his own man. He poured copious amounts of dollars into the media in the state, twice crafting his narrative and building his brand, and it worked. When bombarded with his messaging, North Dakotans took a chance on him twice.
Burgum is about to complete his second two-year term and is eligible to run for a final term, but he announced early in the cycle he is not running again as governor.
Interestingly, he was never endorsed at a single North Dakota Republican convention. Few have asked why. He not once but twice completely skipped the regular process of being nominated by his party at the state convention, opting instead to leap right to the primary. This is seen as an affront to Republicans who believe attending a convention is their opportunity to vet their candidates in person. It’s the process as it is meant to be — and one could argue that by going right to the primary, you are signaling that money and advertising are more important than the constituents you serve.
Trump consistently gets over 60 percent of the vote in North Dakota. But, tellingly, Burgum was not chosen as the delegation chair from North Dakota for the Republican National Convention in July. It is longstanding tradition that with convention delegations, the highest-ranking Republican is the individual voted by the delegation to be the delegation chair and the one to have the honor of being the face of “roll call” for your state on television.
State convention voters not only relegated Burgum to alternate status and seating at the convention, but two U.S. senators and the state’s single congressman preceded him on the alternate list. He cannot be elected delegate chair by the delegation if he’s not a delegate.
Yes, a sitting governor and former presidential candidate is not elected as a delegate by his own party to the 2024 national convention — and there is only silence on the matter. This shows that Burgum is more popular with people who know little about him than the grassroots of the party in his home state.
Foreign Influence
One of the most troubling lapses of the vice presidential vetting process is Burgum’s allowing foreign influence in North Dakota.
Burgum was in favor of placing a Chinese-owned wet corn milling plant (Fufeng) just 12 miles away from a sensitive and strategically important North Dakota Air Force base in 2022.
Then he ran for president of the United States. He was all in for the economic development gains for the state until the political winds changed. Then he joined the citizens of Grand Forks and the rest of the state in calling for more vigilance at the local level.
He’s still all-in on the eminent-domain-for-private-gain scheme of piping other states’ carbon dioxide emissions deep into the North Dakota soil. We’re used to pipelines here, but CO2 at 2,183 psi in a 24-inch diameter pipe traveling 2,500 miles — built by a company new to such pipelines — is an asphyxiant of mammoth proportions, to say nothing of private property rights.
Economic opportunities appear to cloud his judgment on security and safety.
There are far more questions that need to be answered.
North Dakotans want people to make their own decisions, but we should do some on-the-ground investigation before jumping on the Burgum bandwagon.
Lori Hinz lives in North Dakota.
Hopefully Burgum and Vance are no longer on his short list.
Accentuate the positive please. We all have negatives...even me...but don’t tell my kids...
The positive is that Trump does not need Burgum, gains nothing by picking him.
Burghum cries at the drop of a hat. he needs a VP who’s a pit bull.
His peeps did a great job when they picked pence.
Of course, establishment Republicans that back frauds like Ron DeSantis, who groveled to get establishment supporter during his laughable, ill-fate Presidential run. would think otherwise.
However, Vance is absolutely needed in the Senate.
He either had a lot of conservatives fooled or sold out to the establishment after he become VP.
Burgum generated no excitement in the primaries.
He might not be bad for a cabinet position, but likely would not help the campaign.
What is wrong with Vance?
The female pit bull, Elise Stefanik, will be at the debate. She’s very loyal to Trump, from NY and chews dems to the bone. Also, very pro-Israel. The house would have to find someone to replace her though.
Thanks for posting this.
I have a very conservative friend in ND and he told me about two years ago that, among other things, Burgum is a Globalist and not to be trusted. He said Burgum makes Mit Romney look like a rank amateur and he’s as slick as they come.
Given Trump’s disastrous record for picking backstabbers for his team, I wait with trepidation as to whom he might pick for VP and the cabinet.
I hope he learned from his past mistakes.
Accentuate the positive please. We all have negatives...even me...but don’t tell my kids...
><><
That’s a very, very silly statement. You will never be in the position to become POTUS.
Well, this just shows what exactly ?
He bypassed the traditional Republican channels to get elected governor? Considering the low regard we have for the traditional Republican apparatus here on Free Republic, is that a bad thing?
Everyone said and did things during covid which we now wish had not happened. Even Trump is guilty if we want to go there.
I don’t want an Ivy League lawyer anywhere near the Trump ticket. Vance is a hard NO for me.
I vote for sold out or maybe the alphabets has something on him.
👍
Does anyone else think of John Delorean when they see a photo of Burgum?
That’s kind of my reaction too. Burgum isn’t perfect. No one is, including Trump. But as to whether Burgum’s imperfections rise to a level that disqualifies him, I’d need to see more. The article pointed out a few questionable decisions he’s made, but much of the criticism was about him not being popular with the North Dakota Republican Party. To me, that’s not necessarily a bad thing. I’d have to learn more about their feud before I assume that it’s Bergum who’s at fault and not the other way around.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.