Posted on 06/27/2024 6:42:41 AM PDT by Red Badger
Alabama to Maryland for “a job opportunity”...must not be a very promising job opportunity if you only have a single small rental truck to move two families.
A job opportunity... for one person? Not if two families are making the trip.
What kind of job opportunities involve hiring adults from two families that travel together these days, but doesn’t pay moving expenses of both?
They are moving to a state where food and rent are going to be astronomically higher than Alabama.
Let me guess, is it blueberry picking season in Maryland?
Circus acrobats?
Chinese restaurant workers?
Might not be a case of child trafficking but I have a feeling these aren’t citizens.
The video panel on the source is empty. No video. Deleted?
I’m glad it wasn’t human trafficking, but I still feel sorry for them having to move to Maryland.
Somebody don’t want it shown for some reason.....................
Yeah, I wasn=t really inquiring or trying to trouble you with a complaint. Just a rhetorical dev0ce . . .
It says in the article the woman who posted it says: It keeps getting deleted!..........Somebody doesn’t want it to be seen.............
The fact is that our political and cultural “elite” - who control American society - want two things with children:
1. Kill them in the womb, or shortly thereafter; failing that
2. Have sex with them
It all “for the children”, you know.
They worship Molech and Asherah.
Yeah, I saw that too. Thanks, RB. you’re always helping to find news articles. I appreciate your efforts.
Its funny how little effect those couple of debunking posts had on the thread.
Au contraire, i care not at all, y’all.
There are two logical reasons for this.
1. They didn't read the article
2. They skimmed the article and missed that salient fact
I for one, plead guilty on both reasons. Trusting what is put forth, without reading the entire article but reply nonetheless, have a 50/50 chance of making ourselves look like fools. But in reality, it's those who produce the article who are knowingly being dishonest. Because they know their headline belies the actual truth. They rely upon people who read headlines only, and rush to share with others before they actually read the article.
These articles are produced by both well established "news" outlets more often than the independent outlets trying to break into the the news providing sphere of influence.
It's always been a dog-eat-dog industry created my the need to scope the opposition. This has been exacerbated by the instantaneous release of information to increase viewership as a result of the advent of the internet, which has been both a blessing & a curse.
The MSM outlets now also do it for political reasons as they increasingly support one political party over the other, as they help keep their outlets in business.
The pluses & minuses of the fast-pace of modern life. 😋
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.