Who Added an Algorithm to New York State’s Voter Registration Roll, and Why?

HOW THE ALGORITHM WORKS:

Paquette describes the algorithm as a “Spiral Cipher” recoding of the New York state voter registration voter roll. Table 1 below shows the problem (red column numbers added for clarity). Column 1 has registration dates. Column 2 has the County Voter ID No. (“CID”), which is assigned when people register by county. Column 3 has the State Board of Election No. (“SBOEID”), which reflects the state’s translation of the CID into its own database.

The first problem is that the CID and SBOEID numbers bear no relationship to each other, although they should. The second, more serious, problem is that the numbers bear no rational relationship to the order in which the registrations were supposed to have taken place. For example, the numbers in column 2 climb sequentially. The numbers in column 3 (the SBOEID numbers) do not, something spelled out in columns 5 and 6.

Even registration dates from the 1800s have been altered so that the CIDs and SBOEIDs assigned to those voters appear randomly assigned. After all, in 1850, 22 million voters were not registered in New York state. More importantly, two voters registered on the same date, 1/01/1850, should not have CIDs or SBOEIDs so numerically distant (see columns 5 and 6). Nor would voters registered from 1902-1907 have lower CIDs and SBOEIDs than those registered in 1850.

TABLE 1

New York State, Jefferson County; Voter Registration Date versus County Voter Identification Number (CID) and State Board of Election Voter Identification Number (SBOEID)

People looking to cheat did it.

FYI for York County machines...

So if someone of nefarious intent needed to add, say 81 million voters to the rolls at the last minute, their individual voter ID numbers wouldn’t be sequential, but would be mixed in at random with voter IDs going back to the Wilson administration?

Who would feel the need to do that, and why?

Busted.

The mere use of non-sequential numbers by itself does not automatically indicate fraud. In some systems, numbers are random to reduce the chance of a malefactor guessing a number of a financial account. If the system is statewide, some digits may be used. to indicate county or precinct. We need a little mores than lack of sequential numbering to show a real problem (e.g. certain numbers are race coded)

Let’s get the DOJ on this right away! They’ll figure out which part of their organization put the algorithm in the code!

“More importantly, two voters registered on the same date, 1/01/1850, should not have CIDs or SBOEIDs so numerically distant (see columns 5 and 6)”

Utter nonsense. There is no reason why the numbers should be based on registration date, especially for registrations that were not originally entered in a computer database. The records could have been processed in any number of orders; name, date of birth, place of registration, zip code, batches of data, whatever order a select statement without an order by returns them in.

THE STEAL IS ON-—altering voter registration data
with an algorithm is prima facie evidence of a crime.
<><>voter registration rolls are supposed to be honest.
<><>criminals wanting to commit election fraud can gain control of state boards of election,
<><>adding an algorithm to the voter registration database alters the orderly flow of accessible info
<><>conclusion: this activity is presumptively fraudulent.

When did it happen? Before 2020? Before 2016? Sounds like Hillary Clinton’s fingers are all over this. The State Department has a serious problems with the lack of key control at numerous posts. All it requires is that some comsec officer certify the destruction of keying material at post... It should be returned to the Comsec Branch, and then back to NSA. Of course this would add a layer of employment, but if a computer and honest people were required to certify destruction of the key at the point of issuance....

“ So if someone of nefarious intent needed to add, say 81 million voters to the rolls at the last minute, their individual voter ID numbers wouldn’t be sequential, but would be mixed in at random with voter IDs going back to the Wilson administration?”

Boom.

Explained in one sentence.

Thank you.

See post 5

“ So if someone of nefarious intent needed to add, say 81 million voters to the rolls at the last minute, their individual voter ID numbers wouldn’t be sequential, but would be mixed in at random with voter IDs going back to the Wilson administration?”

See post 5

“ So if someone of nefarious intent needed to add, say 81 million voters to the rolls at the last minute, their individual voter ID numbers wouldn’t be sequential, but would be mixed in at random with voter IDs going back to the Wilson administration?”

It’s NY...
Wouldn’t expect anything else...

Also throw in some check digits so mistyping a number or switching two sequential numbers gives an invalid number which can be detected without even looking in the database.

🤔

I hate to bring this up but this is fairly common with multiple databases. A unique key in one is often different from that in another. There's a table that maps one to the other.

What's really going on is that they know from previous elections who is registered (or has a fake registration). They fill out ballots for these people with the Dem candidate. If they actually vote, the ballot is discarded (the electronic system tells them if they voted). Fake ballots are run through the vote counters after the real vote is finished or when mail-in ballots are processed until Shazaam! the Dem wins.

It only takes a handful of people to skew a close election this way with stacks of ballots and is very difficult to prove.

One easy tell is to find precincts with +90% voter turnout and +90% Dem votes in the poorest and least educated precincts. This is obvious in the Chicago Board of Elections website. If you ask questions, of course you're automatically a racist.

This was actually exposed some time ago by a voter integrity group on NY. That group also showed how they could arrange the search to get special results. The purpose of this system is to allow the insertion or deletion of registration records during the election without anyone being able to see that it was done. Therefore they can always come up with the votes they need without triggering red flags. Its only possible purpose is to commit vote fraud. Combine it with unlimited mail in ballots and you control the election. This is also why the NY state government forced unlimited mail in voting on NYS even though NY state residents voted against it on a ballot measure. Last I heard NYS was being sued over that. But I have heard nothing about that in a long time.

And here come the paid disrupters.