Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Local, state opposition to wind and solar projects increased in 2023, study finds
Just the News ^ | 6/14/24 | Kevin Killough

Posted on 06/14/2024 10:13:16 AM PDT by CFW

Opposition to wind and solar projects on the state and local level increased significantly last year, according to a new study by Columbia University’s Sabine Center for Climate Change Law.

In 2023, the report found 73% more local restrictions than the previous year’s report released in May 2023, and 111% more state-level restrictions.

“In nearly every state, local governments have enacted laws and regulations to block or restrict renewable energy facilities, or project opponents have succeeded in forcing the delay or cancellation of particular projects, or both have occurred,” the report states.

(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: climatechange; electricity; greenenergy; opposition; power; solar; wind
Many city and state leaders are on to the solar and wind power scam. Neither wind nor solar power can be stored in a sufficient amount to provide electricity to cities and towns. The "investment" is not worth it.

I'm sure at some point in the future technological discoveries will reach the point that alternate power can be stored for later use in sufficient amounts to be worth the financial investment. That time is not now and its use shouldn't be mandated.

1 posted on 06/14/2024 10:13:16 AM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CFW

As well they should. At least it moves trailer parks down the list for #1 target for tornadoes and big hail.


2 posted on 06/14/2024 10:18:35 AM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this💩? 🚫💉! 🇮🇱👍!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Not just that.

Solar farms built on farm land will ensure that land is unproductive long after the solar farm is gone.


3 posted on 06/14/2024 10:20:49 AM PDT by mewzilla (Never give up; never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
The "investment" is not worth it.

It's plenty worth it if you are harvesting federal money.

I'm sure at some point in the future technological discoveries will reach the point that alternate power can be stored for later use in sufficient amounts to be worth the financial investment.

Don't hold your breath. There's been heavy R&D investment in energy storage for five or more decades and nothing has materialized. Pumped hydro is the only feasible technology but the good sites are few and it's almost impossible to get those permitted.

For years, the hot new storage thing was Compressed Air Energy Storage ("CAES"). This requires a huge underground cavern to store compressed air so depends on the geological formations underground. But only two plants have been built.

4 posted on 06/14/2024 10:26:06 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“When exposing a crime is treated like a crime, you are being ruled by criminals” – Edward Snowden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

The grid should be dependable power. Making the grid depend on intermittent sources is very bad idea.


5 posted on 06/14/2024 10:31:31 AM PDT by Tell It Right (Galatians 6:14 -- May I never boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Wind turbines. What’s not to like?/S

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Jv71D1NxDE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wD8156GNkro


6 posted on 06/14/2024 11:54:04 AM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CFW
In 2023, the report found 73% more local restrictions than the previous year’s report released in May 2023, and 111% more state-level restrictions.

Is that the same as requiring a license, so the different government levels can dip their beaks in the wealthy waters of federal-subsidized development? I can't tell the difference.

7 posted on 06/14/2024 12:37:32 PM PDT by Bernard (“God's cruelest punishment is to let you reap what you sow.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

RACIST!

Hamas is all that matters.


8 posted on 06/14/2024 1:00:29 PM PDT by If You Want It Fixed - Fix It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

“Solar farms built on farm land will ensure that land is unproductive long after the solar farm is gone.”


My rural county allowed one solar farm to be built. It was a failure and a blight so they issued a moratorium on any future solar farms until a long-range study of environmental impact on surrounding farms could be completed. They have been tabling further discussion of the “study” for three years now. LOL!


9 posted on 06/14/2024 1:11:33 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CFW

““In nearly every state, local governments have enacted laws and regulations to block or restrict renewable energy facilities, or project opponents have succeeded in forcing the delay or cancellation of particular projects, or both have occurred,” the report states.”

So the Leftists BRAINWASH the country into becoming a bunch of NIMBY Karens...and with that, the Leftists are surprised?

Easy solution for the Leftists - treaty the NIMBY Karens like Trump supporters and simply jail them.


10 posted on 06/14/2024 2:26:29 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson