[Jonty30]

I’m glad that liberals can’t help but spill the beans when they are conspiring to destroy their enemies.

[Dragonfly]

Should I get my popcorn ready?

[steveo]

not holding my breath

[From The Deer Stand]

Hmmm, Democrats will figure out a way around this.

[roadcat]

"It is against the law for a juror to discuss the case before it had ended."

Hmmn, according to this judge and the prosecutors, only President Trump is gagged and can't discuss anything at all. All the anti-Trumpers can sling all the mud they want regardless of any "laws".

And we aren't crazies! That's a label proved to exist on libs.

[griswold3]

We know it was bogus all along. A misdemeanor past statutes of limitations turned into a felony!?? Harrumph!
Proclaiming a mistrial would save a lot of time and money!

[CFW]

The person who made that FB comment doesn’t realize that the CIA/FBI Deep State has every comment you ever made on social media stored somewhere. All they have to do is narrow it down to time, location, ISP number, etc. Whether a crank comment or an actual relative of a jury member, this person is in a world of hurt.

[Chgogal]

So this is how the Democrats are going to get out of the cesspool they created. Fake a post, claim a mistrial. Yeah, that the ticket.

[virgil]

That judge is an absolute pos and should be deported.

[SuperLuminal]

Probably this is just a little rope-a-dope by our communist masters to generate a false sense of optimism...

Just when we get to try to kick the football, Lucy will let it fall over...

[firebrand]

Does the statement that they’re married mean they can’t testify against each other, don’t bother with pursuing this?

[Bratch]

Judge Merchan Provides Information Indicating Juror in Trump Case May Have Predetermined Guilty Verdict

June 7, 2024 | Sundance | 238 Comments

There’s just something very sketchy about this public release of information from Judge Merchan in New York City.  Merchan doesn’t have an integrity bone and the comment he is bringing attention toward is innocuous and random.  However, Merchan could be trying to get Trump to violate the gag order aspect and talk about jurors; thereby making the sentencing worse.

According to information Merchan is providing the lawyers in the Trump case, a comment was made on the court’s FaceBook page indicating one of the jurors said the Trump guilty verdict was predetermined. [SOURCE]

“My cousin is a juror and says Trump is getting convicted. Thank you folks for all your hard work!!!” 

Why would Judge Merchan want to draw public attention to this?

Either something bigger is being diluted by this story, or perhaps Merchan is using it as a provocation to get Trump to talk about the jury and violate his gag order ahead of sentencing.

Or, perhaps Merchan is looking to create a mistrial to exit the case, or do it over again and extend the gag order.   Also, why not include the entire quote from the Facebook Page:

Not sure what’s going on, but something.  Something….

.

.

Suspicious Cat remains, well, suspicious.

[G Larry]

First, The NY Supreme Court informed Merchan of the finding, this wasn't Merchan fessing up.

Second, The NY Supreme Court would not have bothered contacting Merchan without having first verified the relationship of the poster and the juror, AND verifying there was contact between the two before the post.

The verdict will be tossed and I don't see Merchan getting another bite at the apple in time to get a conviction before the election.

How can you seat a jury that can pretend they haven't been tainted by pre-trial publicity?

[Varsity Flight]

“on Trumps criminal case” was left out in the judge letter.

(vs any juror)

Cover up.

[CatOwner]

Anyone want to bet on this?

[Gene Eric]

At this point, I’m guessing Merchan would prefer a mistrial.

[Bernard]

I got the horse right here, the name is Paul Revere

And here's the guy that says that if all weather's clear

Can do, can do, this guy says the horse can do

If he says the horse can do, can do, can do

And so on.... I

[technically right]

Well, well, well. How convenient. I suspect that they’ve come to realize that their little shit show had the opposite effect that was desired and that Trump might actually get elected, in which case the Trump DOJ may want to perform an annual exam in all those involved.

“Hey, we only kidding. No hard feelings, right ??”

[thefactor]

That person is a “professional sh-tposter.” This will go nowhere.

[ChildOfThe60s]

Not gonna happen. They have gone too far, violated too many laws to back down now. They know if Trump isn’t jailed because of this sham trial, they will have to rely on massive vote fraud to keep him out of the WH.

It’s lose, lose for them but they they can’t quit.

But when the “judge” fails to declare a mistrial, and he will not, it will be an admission this was a setup.

But remember, 40% of the people don’t care if it was a sham trial. My BIL would say (if I talked to him) that even a sham trial is justified to keep Trump out of the WH.

Sh*t’s getting real people.