Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservative98
First, The NY Supreme Court informed Merchan of the finding, this wasn't Merchan fessing up.

Second, The NY Supreme Court would not have bothered contacting Merchan without having first verified the relationship of the poster and the juror, AND verifying there was contact between the two before the post.

The verdict will be tossed and I don't see Merchan getting another bite at the apple in time to get a conviction before the election.

How can you seat a jury that can pretend they haven't been tainted by pre-trial publicity?

35 posted on 06/07/2024 5:41:40 PM PDT by G Larry (Biden Fundraising Failure: More advertising for rotting fish is unlikely to improve sales....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: G Larry

Ohh, believe me, they’ll take another bite.


37 posted on 06/07/2024 5:53:36 PM PDT by Husker24 (Pp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: G Larry

Do you have anything concrete to support your statement about the NYSC not contacting Merchan without first verifying the poster-juror relationship, or is that just your presumption?

Thanks in advance for any information you may have about this.


80 posted on 06/16/2024 9:37:27 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson