[convoter2016]

Actually I don’t believe it. Closing off many avenues of appeal seems to suggest to judge bent over backwards to let the defense have its way but I sense the judge made many motions that benefited the prosecution, not the defense. For example, Trump’s lawyer wanted a change in venue but the judge denied that motion.

[FreeReign]

Actually I don’t believe it.

I don't either. Its the NY Times making excuses for future corrupt rulings by the NYS appellate courts.

[bigfootbob]

Nor do I.

[Auntie Dem]

Actually I don’t believe it. Closing off many avenues of appeal seems to suggest to judge bent over backwards to let the defense have its way but I sense the judge made many motions that benefited the prosecution, not the defense. For example, Trump’s lawyer wanted a change in venue but the judge denied that motion.

You must remember, the article cited legal "experts". How can you compete with that?

[Georgia Girl 2]

The judge can’t stop you from appealing. 😆

[Gaffer]

This judge worked at every point to make sure that Trump could not defend himself.

[Verginius Rufus]

The Journal Editorial Report team discussed the Trump trial and its implications at length today. They nitpicked over supposed mistakes by the defense as if the outcome could have been any different.

One idiot suggested that the defense team should have admitted that Trump had an affair with Stormy Daniels. Huh? Trump says it never happened, and even she has previously said it never happened. But it was clever of the judge to let her testify (to irrelevant matters) at the trial, because even a lot of people who plan to vote for Trump (like Tyrus on Gutfeld) now believe that the affair took place. That could cost Trump some votes in November.