Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sidebar Moderator

Judge Merchan has erred on the side of inclusion. There was a subsequent request to add more and he approved it. There is another note from the jury

The jury is asking for instructions on count one and how to deal with evidence and the inference to be drawn from evidence. He will read pages 7-35.

The inference instructions are interesting. It is not the corroboration or perjury material that would have presumably focused on Cohen. However, the inference sections would go to how much that can read into the implications of testimony. Much of Cohen’s testimony did not concretely establish knowledge or intent by Trump but the prosecutors insisted that they could infer from that evidence

Likewise, Pecker’s testimony tied his actions to the election and the question is how much can the jury infer from the accounts of the Trump Tower meeting that Trump knew and approved of this effort

I should have said better than good news. The corroboration and perjury instructions would have suggested that Cohen was the stumbling block. This goes to the question of weight that can be given to these accounts. Notably, they are asking for mostly Pecker’s account but also have a request for a Cohen passage


4 posted on 05/30/2024 6:55:40 AM PDT by janetjanet998 (Legacy media including youtube are the enemy of the people and must die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: janetjanet998

The jury specifically raised the “rain metaphor” in their request for the readback. That metaphor is meant to suggest that observing some facts can confirm the occurrence of other prior facts like seeing umbrellas to show that it has rained. The defense has obviously resisted the sweeping inferences from the prosecution.

The instructions state that you can draw an inference from any fact that is proven. Hence the rain metaphor. If you go to bed that it was not raining, but in the morning you see wet grounds and people carrying umbrellas. However, the inference must not be speculative but a natural conclusion from a previously established fact

https://x.com/JonathanTurley/status/1796178503584366675


7 posted on 05/30/2024 6:57:29 AM PDT by janetjanet998 (Legacy media including youtube are the enemy of the people and must die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998
I believe Count 1 is the same as all others....but not really because the first two checks were not signed by Trump...

I'll go back and see if all 34 counts are identical.

24 posted on 05/30/2024 7:13:48 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

*** The jury is asking for instructions on count one***

What is the charge on count one?


28 posted on 05/30/2024 7:15:25 AM PDT by FamiliarFace (I got my own way of livin' But everything gets done With a southern accent Where I come from. TPetty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

Excellent analysis.


231 posted on 05/30/2024 11:02:43 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998; Sidebar Moderator
There was a subsequent request to add more and he approved it.

Add "more" what?

256 posted on 05/30/2024 11:31:52 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson