Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Based on… what?

Juror misconduct? Cuz that seems about all it could be.


31 posted on 05/29/2024 7:45:46 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fury
Juror misconduct? Cuz that seems about all it could be.

Juan Merchan has overwhelmingly demonstrated that anything can be anything he wants it to be.

34 posted on 05/29/2024 7:47:18 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Fury

Here are the rules for removal of a juror. Notice that failure to deliberate leaves a lot of wiggle room: https://legal-info.lawyers.com/criminal/criminal-law-basics/excluding-jurors-removing-and-disqualifying.html


37 posted on 05/29/2024 7:49:07 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Fury

Another thing is if the prosecution would try to contact the hold-out, and then the judge could remove that juror.

There are a lot of dirty tricks that could be played.

Jurors can also be dismissed if they have a family emergency or are ill - both of which can be managed by the “six ways from Sunday at getting back at you” Deep State...


41 posted on 05/29/2024 7:50:50 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson