Posted on 05/29/2024 8:23:32 AM PDT by janetjanet998
Merchan just delivered the coup de grace instruction. He said that there is no need to agree on what occurred. They can disagree on what the crime was among the three choices. Thus, this means that they could split 4-4-4 and he will still treat them as unanimous
So a dead misdemeanor for falsifying business records was zapped back into life by alleging that under NY election law 17-152 it was done to influence the election by the unlawful means of falsification of business records. It is so circular as to produce vertigo. So the jury finds some documents were falsified to use the unlawful means of falsifying other documents. That is only one of three possible crimes and the jury does not have to agree on which was the basis for their conviction.
HUH?? Biden tried to ban live betting on the upcoming election?? Really?
“That judge needs to be tarred and feathered as soon as this trial is over!”
That might be ok for starters. If we said prayers for him he would probably spontaneously combust.
It delivers three 4/12
verdicts, which is extremely weak.
__
I’m surprised the judge didn’t add on a jaywalking charge or something just in case a juror thinks he’s not guilty on one of the other 3
I doubt that. The judge is just bonkers.
Lol!
HUH?
This ‘trial’ makes the trial of Alice in Wonderland look sane...................
For the life of me I cannot understand why SCOTUS does not intervene and kill this.
Everything about this sham trial is unconstitutional. It doesn’t even matter if Trump is convicted and it overturned the next day. The Democrats will go to any length to prevent Trump from being reelected. I’m sure they have other plans up their sleeves.
…and it has to be felony j-walking.
Agreed!
“But President Trump was not intending to cover up ANY crime of the take-you-pick improvised list, followed through or not.”
I agree with you. But that’s a factual issue, not a content of the jury instruction issue.
“...There are no Biden ‘Rat Kangaroo Judges...”
- John Roberts
My question would be, will he be jailed if a guilty verdict is reached, or will he be allowed to stay out while the appeal is processing?
📌👁️
So were Nelson Mandela and Lech Walesa. We have gone from,”Innocent until proven guilty “ to,”Show me the man and I’ll find you a crime”.
I hope the judge himself is sued and taken to court over his handling of this court case. That itself is a crime!
That is the country of Colombia with an “o”.
He has zero connections to Columbia— whatever meaning of that name (the school, the Statue, the Country of USA, the river, etc.
This person indeed is frightened what the cartels will do to him and his crazed daughter. His actions speak this— because NO one who swears (under even NY State Oath) to uphold the Constitution of the United States, would IGNORE SCOTUS (recent ones even) rulings on the Chinese Menu approach to a conviction on an undescribed crime in the charging documents. This, in Revolutionary days, and in olde Europe is known as a bill of Attainder. In Bolshevik Soviet Russia it would be the “Beria Description”. You can NOT have this is US jurisprudence-— anywhere.
This judge should be in fear, from MANY different directions... the money cannot protect him from wherever it is coming . Crazed present dent who will not be the nominee btw— cannot affect this. And the jury members will be harrassed to reveal their decisions— by the jackal “press” and their “agents”.
The Secret Service can decide— he MUST leave the building— in fear of his life. They can do this. Film at 11:00.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.