Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Regulator; E. Pluribus Unum; JennysCool; Yo-Yo; AndyJackson; bray; Dan in Wichita

As I wrote elsewhere, I don’t know what is more breathtaking.

1. The FBI was empowered to used deadly force when raiding Mar-A-Lago.

2. The FBI’s response to the news was, “it’s no big deal….we are empowered to open fire ALL THE TIME.”

3. The FBI thought #2 would fix #1.


31 posted on 05/23/2024 3:51:01 PM PDT by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s² )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleBob
2. The FBI’s response to the news was, “it’s no big deal….we are empowered to open fire ALL THE TIME.”

Every police officer that carries a sidearm is empowered to use deadly force only when appropriate.

Did you even read what I posted?

If so, you would have seen this:

"Law enforcement officers of the Department of Justice may use deadly force only when necessary, that is, when the officer has a reasonable belief that the subject of such force poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the officer or to another person.

"Deadly force may not be used solely to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect.

"Firearms many not be fired solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle..."

Not exactly empowered to just open fire at will.

33 posted on 05/23/2024 4:28:39 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson