Skip to comments.
Mike Johnson Backs Allowing Ukraine to Strike Russia with U.S.-Provided Weapons
Breitbart ^
| 05/22/2024
| SEAN MORAN
Posted on 05/22/2024 1:14:44 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) on Wednesday appeared to back allowing Ukraine to use American-provided weapons to strike Russia or Russian-controlled territory.
One reporter asked Johnson about a House Intelligence Committee letter calling on the Biden administration to allow Ukraine to strike Russia with American-supplied weapons.
The letter stipulates that this would allow Ukraine to strike “Russian-controlled territory” as well as Russian territory and represents a significant escalation in America’s seemingly endless proxy war against Russia.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War
KEYWORDS: actofwar; bidenswarofchoice; chaddeusmaximus; escalation; fakechristian; fakesnake; followthemoney; foreignagent; hewenttojared; johnson; judasjohnson; killkillkillforpeace; mic; neoconshateamerica; nucularcombattttwtr; psychomaximus; russia; theodormaximus; tothelastukrainian; ukiecannonfodder; ukraine; ukrainelobbyist; undeclaredwar; weapons; welfarewar; whatconstitution; whatcouldgowrong; zeeperselated
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-125 next last
To: jerod
They revolted against Communism and won... They can do the same against Putinism. Except that Putin's popularity has increased since the beginning of this conflict. But you keep watching the MSM and dreaming of victory.
41
posted on
05/22/2024 2:19:16 PM PDT
by
fireman15
(Irritating people are the grit from which we fashion our pearl. I provide the grit. You're Welcome.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
42
posted on
05/22/2024 2:19:36 PM PDT
by
budj
(Combat vet, second of three generations.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
43
posted on
05/22/2024 2:21:38 PM PDT
by
cowboyusa
(YESHUA IS KING AMERICA, AND HE WILL HAVE NO OTHER GODS BEFORE HIM!)
To: ChicagoConservative27
44
posted on
05/22/2024 2:23:55 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(Is it me, or all of a sudden have the buried trolls come out on FR like cicadas? It's all noise.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
I wonder if Johnson backs fighting a nuclear war with Russia?
45
posted on
05/22/2024 2:29:16 PM PDT
by
Revel
To: map
None of these someones is in danger of going to the Front themselves. Talk is always cheap.
46
posted on
05/22/2024 2:36:54 PM PDT
by
Seruzawa
("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
To: ChicagoConservative27
Johnson doesn’t deserve to keep his seat, let alone remain Speaker. He’s completely compromised.
47
posted on
05/22/2024 2:43:09 PM PDT
by
Kazan
To: ChicagoConservative27
This is a little late. There have been a number of attacks against Russian held areas to include ships, airbases, border checkpoints, villages, industrial complexes, and fuel depots over the last few years. Trying to write them off in a combat situation is stupid. And saying your side didn’t hit the other side is dishonest. Gimme a break.
Wy69
48
posted on
05/22/2024 2:44:10 PM PDT
by
whitney69
(yption tunnels)
To: All
I would guess the optimal response would be hypersonic missiles provided to ISIS K and transported to Mexico to launch from there. Yeah, the same ISIS K that our MSM jumped to declare the culprit in Moscow a few months ago, with all of them agreeing in a matter of minutes, after someone called them all and said they were ISIS K and they did it.
49
posted on
05/22/2024 2:46:17 PM PDT
by
Owen
(.)
Comment #50 Removed by Moderator
To: ChicagoConservative27
51
posted on
05/22/2024 3:03:22 PM PDT
by
Nextrush
(FREEDOM IS EVERYBODY'S BUSINESS-REMEMBER REV. NIEMOLLER)
To: adorno
The whole point is to prevent this from becoming a world war.
To: fireman15
Yes, so why shouldn't Russia use their weapons to attack the United States or our allies?
Not calling you stupid, but, that's a stupid question.
Russia knows there is a big difference between the U.S. and Ukraine. Ukraine is a much smaller target, and right next to Russia.
Ukraine doesn't have nuclear weapons and the Ukraine military is much smaller, so, when it comes to targets, Ukraine seemed to be a simple takeover. The U.S. is not so simple and Russia would be suicidal to go against the U.S. or its allies. A bully only picks on the smaller targets and easier targets. The U.S. has a much bigger military than Russia, and the U.S. has an economy at least 10 times bigger than Russia, where a strong economy is necessary to support any war effort.
So, was I right in calling your question, stupid?
53
posted on
05/22/2024 3:17:14 PM PDT
by
adorno
(CCH)
To: ChicagoConservative27
If Ukraine begins using US weapons to hit targets inside Russia, Putin will obliterate Kiev and that will be the end of the war.
To: phil00071
The whole point is to prevent this from becoming a world war.
The whole point, and more real point, is that, allowing Russia to take Ukraine will definitely bring on WWIII, perhaps not immediately, but soon after.
Shortsightedness has brought on a lot more wars than meeting the danger immediately.
55
posted on
05/22/2024 3:22:26 PM PDT
by
adorno
(CCH)
To: phil00071
The whole point is to prevent this from becoming a world war.
The whole point, and more real point, is that, allowing Russia to take Ukraine will definitely bring on WWIII, perhaps not immediately, but soon after.
Shortsightedness has brought on a lot more wars than meeting the danger immediately.
56
posted on
05/22/2024 3:23:23 PM PDT
by
adorno
(CCH)
Comment #57 Removed by Moderator
To: phil00071
If Ukraine begins using US weapons to hit targets inside Russia, Putin will obliterate Kiev and that will be the end of the war.
Think again.
Your way of thinking about what Russia would do, is totally wrong. What would really happen if Russia does 'obliterate' Ukraine, is that, Russia would have a much bigger problem in its hands, where all of Europe would get involved against Russia, with the U.S. joining the fight.
Not a big picture thinker, are you?
58
posted on
05/22/2024 3:27:23 PM PDT
by
adorno
(CCH)
To: adorno
Your implication/suggestion that Ukraine was a ‘target’/simple takeover is stupid.
59
posted on
05/22/2024 3:34:15 PM PDT
by
A strike
(There is no tyranny that cannot be justified by 'climate change')
To: adorno
Wow, Russia is firing US rockets into Ukraine?! Well, then I suppose your two-way street scenario makes sense.
Except, they’re Russian rockets aren’t they? Don’t you think that makes a big difference? Ukraine can fire their own rockets into Russia until the cows come home as far as I’m concerned. But if they’re US arms, then let’s hold off on starting WWIII just to keep the deep state’s graft going in Ukraine, please.
60
posted on
05/22/2024 3:37:28 PM PDT
by
TauntedTiger
(If voting mattered, they wouldn't let us do it. Mark Twain)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-125 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson