Posted on 05/09/2024 6:20:04 AM PDT by Red Badger
A new report sheds light on a pervasive culture of sexual harassment plaguing a major federal entity under the watch of President Joe Biden.
Law firm Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton was tasked with investigating the workplace at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) in 2023, and released its 234-page report on Tuesday. Throughout the investigation, 500 individuals, close to one-in-ten employees at the entire FDIC, reported “experiences of sexual harassment, discrimination, and other interpersonal misconduct” in the workplace to the firm’s tip line.
The incidents reported to the firm, the report said, “did not occur in a vacuum,” and were rather the result of a “misogynistic,” “patriarchal,” “insular” and “outdated” workplace. In its executive summary, the firm pulled out specific accounts of such sexual harassment that it discovered during its investigation.
“Women in one field office recounted how, to their dismay, it became routine to hear their supervisor talk about their breasts and legs and his sex life,” the report stated.
“A woman examiner reported on the shock of receiving a picture of an FDIC senior examiner’s private parts out of the blue while serving on detail in a field office, only to be told later by others in that field office that she should stay away from him because he had a ‘reputation,'” the firm reported.
Other examples of harassment in the workplace revolved around discrimination and bullying, the report notes.
“Individuals reported that an employee with a disability was being made fun of by a supervisor, including being called ‘Pirate McNasty,’ the report says.
“Certain employees from underrepresented groups reported on how demoralizing it was to be told by colleagues that they were ‘only hired’ because they were a member of an underrepresented group and were ‘token’ employees hired to fill a quota,” the firm writes.
As a part of the report, the firm detailed how the FDIC was handling concerns of harassment in the workplace and its processes to administer discipline. The first step, the report notes, is to issue an employee a warning.
For unionized employees, however, that option is neutered, the report states.
“For bargaining unit employees, counseling or warning letters may not be used as evidence for progressive discipline, and are normally removed from an employee’s file no later than one year after the date of issuance absent a legitimate administrative need,” according to the report. Such union protocols appear to make it harder to discipline or remove employees who face harassment allegations, the Wall Street Journal Editorial Board wrote.
“[A]ccording to the FDIC’s own public reporting, of the ninety-two harassment complaints made through its Anti-Harassment Program in the nine year period from 2015 to 2023, not a single one resulted in removal, reductions in grade or pay, or any discipline more serious than a suspension,” the report stated, adding that of those harassment complaints, two suspensions, two letters of reprimand, and twelve warnings were administered. The rest apparently did not result in punishment.
Throughout the process of the investigation, the firm was required to follow union protocols put in place at the FDIC.
“For bargaining unit employees, we informed them whether they were being interviewed as potential subjects or witnesses, of their right to union representation at the interview should they reasonably believe the interview may result in disciplinary action against them, and that the interview would be scheduled to allow them an opportunity to seek the counsel of a union representative if they wished to do so,” the report notes.
Through the 2024 election, union support has been the backbone of Biden’s campaign pitch. The president has attended several union events to receive endorsements and has gone to the picket line to support striking union auto workers.
During his administration, Biden has supported legislation that supports victims of sexual harassment in the workplace. The president signed a bill into law in December 2022 that axed confidentiality agreements which previously prohibited victims from publicly discussing sexual harassment they experienced in the office.
FDIC Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg released a statement in response to the internal report, pledging to implement the recommendations made by the firm to ensure an improved workplace. Gruenberg was named in the report for having a reputation for his temper, as some employees recounted times he “chewed [them] out” and threw papers against the wall in anger.
“As you know, the detailed Action Plan we released last December begins to address many of the issues outlined in the report—providing more support to victims, in-person training for all FDIC employees, strengthening procedures for reporting, and improving accountability for anyone who is found to engage in misconduct, including separation from the agency,” he wrote in a press release. “In many instances, our Action Plan goes beyond the recommendations in the report. We will spare no effort to create a workplace where every employee feels safe, valued, and respected.”
Some of the firm’s recommendations included providing mental health resources, retaining a third party watchdog to ensure the culture is changed and frequent performance reviews.
The White House responded to the report in a statement on Tuesday.
“He apologized and has committed to the recommendations that have been provided by the independent report and going to further fix the longstanding issues, obviously, that are in the report,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said in a statement to Bloomberg.
For me, this is just operation chaos. I don’t think FDIC is much different from any large organization. Some people either don’t know boundaries, or they don’t understand them.
Consistently good behavior is actually quite rare among people — especially when they think they’re not being observed.
Not any earth-shattering story, in my view; but I say, “Let ‘er rip” if it causes the cadaver’s regime any grief.
“’Certain employees from underrepresented groups reported on how demoralizing it was to be told by colleagues that they were ‘only hired’ because they were a member of an underrepresentd group and were ‘token’ employees hired to fill a quota,’” the firm writes.”
Isn’t that the law of the land now?
The truth hurts but it’s still the truth..................
It’s not isolated to the FDIC. Inspect any agency and find the same thing.
Any large company or corporation or even a church group......................
“Women in one field office recounted how, to their dismay, it became routine to hear their supervisor talk about their breasts and legs and his sex life,” the report stated.
“A woman examiner reported on the shock of receiving a picture of an FDIC senior examiner’s private parts out of the blue while serving on detail in a field office, only to be told later by others in that field office that she should stay away from him because he had a ‘reputation,’” the firm reported.
Most of the rest of it sounds like the fruit of any invitation to whine anonymously. Email every employee a memo that says: “Don’t say or do the sort of crap listed below” and move on.
Don't they understand that we have one justice system for the ruling class and one for the peasants?
First of all, babies and spouses don't come from Amazon.com (at least not yet).
People have been meeting at work and dating and etc., ever since Fred met Betty at the gravel pit in the Flintstones.
If some guy acts up at work he needs to be pasted in the face by the offended male/female/tranny.
Funny how, if some court takes this FDIC thing and runs with it, the guilty individuals NEVER pay the fine. It is the Government (i.e., We The People) who have to shell out for this. If it is a private company, then the shareholders do.
Fred was married to Wilma. If he met Betty at the Gravel Pit there was some hanky-panky going on and Barney would have killed him................
Stomped him with those yuge Barney Rubble feet. Which makes me wonder why Betty would stray...
But, educators get to talk about their sex life to students, so what's the issue?
Obviously, you haven’t been on the receiving end of sexual harassment. It’s not about dating, or finding a mate, or mutual hooking up.
Shortly, It’s not about sex.
Sure, there are bad-faith complainers that are looking for money. But actual harassment does occur, and it’s vile, demoralizing, and stems from exerting power or dehumanizing the individual harassed. Don’t blame the victim of actual harassment.
Thanks for correcting me. I hate it when I incorrectly allude to the classics when making a point. Very embarrassing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.