Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Social Security funds to last longer than expected thanks to sturdy economy
The Hill ^ | 05/06/2024 | ARIS FOLLEY

Posted on 05/06/2024 1:48:54 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

The combined trust funds for Social Security are projected to run out a year later than previously expected, a board of trustees of the program’s accounts said Monday.

In the latest report, trustees expect the projected depletion date for the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund, which pays out Social Security benefits to retirees, and the program’s smaller Disability Insurance (DI) Trust Fund is 2035.

Biden administration officials said the projected depletion date for the OASI trust funds has moved to November 2033, seven months later than last year’s projection, partly due to economic growth.

On a call with reporters ahead of the release, an official said the trustees increased their assumed level of labor productivity and GDP in the coming years after economic growth exceeded expectations last year.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: donatefreerepublic; ecnomy; ecnomylol; fakenews; funds; itsbrokejim; jimknows; joindu; longer; ponzischeme; socialsecurity; weallknow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: Roklok

“Yep, the clot shot killed untold numbers of senior citizens.”

“untold”. How many is too many to count?


21 posted on 05/06/2024 2:04:37 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

If Aris’ brain neurons are like her hair, her thinking will never be straightened out.


22 posted on 05/06/2024 2:04:43 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

SS was never supposed to run out. Lyin’ Lyndon Johnson said so in 1964!

https://www.ssa.gov/history/ssa/usa1964-2.html

Self-Supporting

“The program is designed so that contributions plus interest on the investments of the social security trust funds will be sufficient to meet all of the costs of benefits and administration, now and into the indefinite future—without any subsidy from the general funds of the Government.

“Both the Congress and the Executive Branch, regardless of political party in power, have scrupulously provided in advance for full financing of all liberalizations in the program.”

Back around 2004, AARP magazine had an article on why the SS is not a Ponzi Scheme. Ponzi Schemes run out of money and collapse. Since the SS system has never collapsed it is not a Ponzi scheme.

A few pages on in that same issue, Jane Bryant Quinn had an article on how the SS system was set up. Without saying the word “Ponzi” it is set up just like a Ponzi scheme with compulsory membership.

How it was originally supposed to work....You paid in all your life, then retired at 62. BUT the average life expectancy then was 57 years of age.

Then came Penicillin.


23 posted on 05/06/2024 2:05:16 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar ( Government is not reason, it is not eloquence-it is force!--G. Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Too many people are gullible enough to believe this.


24 posted on 05/06/2024 2:05:24 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

There are no “funds.” Nothing is sitting in a desk or vault somewhere.

Its all part of the Fed.gov budget, just one pocket telling the other empty pocket - “hey, you still owe me $2 trillion....”


25 posted on 05/06/2024 2:05:34 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Farce.

The ss money can always be printed. It’s FIAT!

We should know this because Ukraine


26 posted on 05/06/2024 2:05:59 PM PDT by C210N (Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Ponzi Schemes usually work this way.


27 posted on 05/06/2024 2:06:18 PM PDT by CodeToad (Rule #1: The elites want you dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The “one year” difference is insignificant and does nothing to change the need for SS funding and benefit reforms. Sooner and much less than later Congress and the occupant of the White House will be forced, unwillingly, to deal with the matter, and everyone will blame them when any reforms are legislated, whlle in truth it is all their predecessor Congress and Presidents who will have failed the most by just kicking the can down the road all the time.


28 posted on 05/06/2024 2:06:54 PM PDT by Wuli ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanne

I’ve paid the max amount almost every years since my late 20’s and am not even eligible to start receiving payments until a few years after its supposed to be done for

IMO they could close the whole thing tomorrow and it wouldn’t bother me a bit


29 posted on 05/06/2024 2:07:46 PM PDT by Manuel OKelley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: The Louiswu

You are smart to take it Early.

It’s a hell of a shock to get your Bank statement to find out the Biden regime is taking half your social security checks to repay emergency catastrophe relief funds that they decided 3 years later was just a loan plus $9,000 interest!

Due process??? Roflmao

They are coming after Trump supporters and they want us old people DEAD.


30 posted on 05/06/2024 2:08:06 PM PDT by AuntB (Trump is our Ben Franklin - Brilliant, Boisterous, Brave and ALL AMERICAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

A mere 7 months longer than projected is nothing to crow about.


31 posted on 05/06/2024 2:11:08 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Louiswu
I turn 62 in September but will hold off only because I'm still working fulltime. No sense having the payments reduced and taxed.

Like you, not sure if waiting to 67 or 70 is worth it in the long run despite the higher payments I would theoretically receive. I have a feeling that if the government gets any more socialist, they will have means testing to receive Social Security and as I have a lot in my IRA, they may try to say I don't need it.

32 posted on 05/06/2024 2:12:58 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (6,575,474 Truth | 87,429,044 Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I love the Bee..oh wait.


33 posted on 05/06/2024 2:15:31 PM PDT by cowboyusa (YESHUA IS KING OF AMERICA, AND HE WILL HAVE NO OTHER GODS BEFORE HIM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Took mine @ 67.....I was still working @ the time.


34 posted on 05/06/2024 2:16:03 PM PDT by Osage Orange (ooooOO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

We’ve added millions of laborers to our economy. So that’s why our piggy bank for social security is lasting a little bit longer.


35 posted on 05/06/2024 2:17:37 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Manuel OKelley

It was a scam from the start

I was well acquainted with people in my family who were around when it started. New York finance people. They said it was an outrageous scam.


36 posted on 05/06/2024 2:18:13 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

to be “revised” right after trump takes office again


37 posted on 05/06/2024 2:19:51 PM PDT by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

And with 10 million *new* wetbacks added to the 30 million that have been here for years Social Security will last for 100 years.


38 posted on 05/06/2024 2:21:24 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Proudly Clinging To My Guns And My Religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Can't we just get money that we put into the lock box?
39 posted on 05/06/2024 2:25:08 PM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roklok
Yep, the clot shot killed untold numbers of senior citizens.

A disproportionate number for sure and all by design. I think the perps who concocted this farce should be hunted down, indicted, and charged with mass murder and get the only punishment that fits this crime against humanity.

A public hanging in front of the White House.

40 posted on 05/06/2024 2:25:56 PM PDT by Boomer (If the Nazi-Rats and Rinos win, everyone loses. The Uniparty can no longer claim they are American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson