Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Banning Trump from talking about his trial is blatant election interference
New York Post ^ | May 3, 2024, 5:09 p.m | Andrew Cherkasky and Katie Cherkasky

Posted on 05/03/2024 5:37:18 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

A “heckler’s veto” refers to when someone disagrees with a speaker’s message and manages to trigger events that silence the speaker. 

Judge Juan Merchan’s gag order on former President Donald Trump in his hush money case and the sanctions he imposed for Trump’s alleged violation of that order are an outrageous form of that veto.

Merchan slapped Trump with thousands of dollars in sanctions and even threatened him with incarceration for future violations.

In fact, both the order and the sanctions are wildly unconstitutional.

While the former president is on trial, with headlines blaring minute-by-minute attacks on the leading presidential candidate’s character and conduct, he is gagged from defending himself in the public eye.

Polling suggests the trial could be the deciding factor in November, yet he can’t talk about it.

The Supreme Court has held that a “candidate, no less than any other person, has a First Amendment right to engage in the discussion of public issues and vigorously and tirelessly to advocate his own election.”

The court also ruled that “even a short-lived ‘gag’ order in a case of widespread concern to the community constitutes a substantial prior restraint and causes irreparable injury to First Amendment interests as long as it remains in effect.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dissent; freespeech; israel; trump

1 posted on 05/03/2024 5:37:18 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

And they dare to blame Russia 🇷🇺 for intervening in our elections?!


2 posted on 05/03/2024 5:37:53 PM PDT by No name given (Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No name given

“Blaming Russia” was blatant election interference by the Media/government cartel.


3 posted on 05/03/2024 5:42:48 PM PDT by marktwain (The Republic is at risk. Resistance to the Democratic Party is Resistance to Tyranny. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Bkmk


4 posted on 05/03/2024 5:53:16 PM PDT by sauropod ("This is a time when people reveal themselves for who they are." James O'Keefe Ne supra crepidam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Pretend—I had lunch with Trump and he gave me information about this Commie Trial. I posted these facts on every blog. Am I guilty of something?


5 posted on 05/03/2024 5:54:31 PM PDT by Mark (DONATE ONCE every 3 months-is that a big deal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No name given

Exactly. These lawfare trials are nothing but election interference.


6 posted on 05/03/2024 6:48:00 PM PDT by Parley Baer (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Trump should stand there, and whisper into someone’s ear, who immediately, like a town cryer repeat what Trump told him/her.
Technically that is not Trump speaking. Lol


7 posted on 05/03/2024 7:08:25 PM PDT by bantam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Thank the judge, because the judge is preventing Trump from making self-inflicted wounds, again.

The judge is doing Trump a favor.


8 posted on 05/03/2024 7:22:03 PM PDT by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linMcHlp
Thank the judge, because the judge is preventing Trump from making self-inflicted wounds, again.

We need a Presidential candidate who knows how to go along to get along, not fight like Hell and beat them to a pulp.

9 posted on 05/03/2024 7:23:50 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Hush Money” case indeed.


10 posted on 05/03/2024 8:08:55 PM PDT by AndyTheBear (Certified smarter than average for my species)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson