Not guilty!
Though, I would send her directly to (my) room doe “remediation” and “penance.”
What if the teacher had been male? And the student either sex, male or female? Would it then be “No harm, no foul?”
We have no idea how he might have been harmed.
(Why did his parents go to the pastor first, instead of police?)
The accused, Reagan Gray, who was a volunteer at one of Arkansas’ largest churches, claimed she limited their sexual activity to oral interactions so he could “stay pure”.
I see she went with the tried and trie Bill Clinton defense.
I’ll enroll in whatever class she’s teaching.
But, the problem isn’t that he is scarred for life - it’s that she held power as a teacher over him, and abused it.
It’s not the sex, it’s the power difference and coverup that gets you in trouble.
The affidavit details that an FBI investigator interviewed the alleged victim in February and was told the alleged victim and Gray had sexual contact when Gray was 23 years old and the victim was 15 years old. The alleged victim also said he received nude images on the phone from Gray “on a daily basis” and that she requested the victim send images as well.
Per the affidavit, the alleged victim told investigators they did not remember sending images but considering the nature of the relationship, he said it probably did happen.
no fair to just tease the kid
prosecute her for false advertising
or something
https://www.ucc.org/drag-performance-as-worship-and-praise/
Drag Performance as Worship and Praise[Snip]
by Roberto Ochoa | published on Jun 29, 2023
When I was pastoring a small-membership, open and affirming UCC church in Worcester, MA, I approached the congregation with the idea of having a drag performance in our sanctuary during Pride week as a form of outreach, as a fundraiser, and as a safe space for the local LGBTQAI+ communities, especially for the youth. The reaction was mixed, as some of the members had never heard of “drag” (crossdressing with exaggerated gender features for the purpose of entertainment). Nevertheless, the congregation felt moved to approve and sponsor the event.
The kid is 15. This is not cute. It’s not sexy. It’s sick.
“Not guilty! The only person harmed is the now 17 year old from all the high-fives at school.”
Maybe she found the only gay guy in the Class of 2027, but even if so, she needs some SERIOUS Jury Nullification, as it’s not her fault that the guy was weird.
Some kids have all the luck! When I was that age all I had were fantasies.
Well, it worked for Clinton - Bill that is.
I guess that stems from a famous Arkansan who said he “did not have sex with that woman.” After all, I guess it does depend on what the meaning of “is” is.
Why does she need to prey on 15 year olds?
AR age of consent is 16, not that it will matter to the absolutists.
Not Guilty.
Without seeing the photos, I am unable to decide if she’s guilty or not