(Hopefully that's easy for people to share on X, cellphone, etc.)
Posted on 04/22/2024 1:41:42 PM PDT by Morgana
When the Dobbs ruling overturned Roe v. Wade, we knew the abortion industry would not go away quietly without a fight. As you know, after our amicus brief was cited by the U.S. Supreme Court in overturning Roe, Liberty Counsel has been fighting the abortion industry’s attempts to make killing an unborn child a “right” in state constitutions across the country.
Beyond barbaric …
Now, the abortion industry is going for a bigger prize — federal legislation to force every state to wipe away all abortion restrictions. The bill even goes so far as to overturn the federal ban on gruesome partial birth abortion, which murders a viable, full-term baby before its head leaves the mother’s womb.
Late-term abortion murders viable babies who could, if given the chance, live outside their mother’s womb. In a typical procedure, everything except for the baby’s head is outside the mother’s body. Then, just before the child’s head comes out, the abortionist drives a spike through the child’s skull, literally scrambling the baby’s brain to kill the child.
Instead of a spike to the brain, some abortionists, like the demonic Kermit Gosnell, use heavy duty scissors to sever the child’s spinal cord once the legs, torso, and neck, but not head, are outside the birth canal.
Late-term abortion is beyond barbaric, and it’s hard to believe that nearly half of Congress wants to overturn the 1992 federal ban on this horrific practice. But as we saw in the undercover videos our client Sandra Merritt filmed, Planned Parenthood makes big money from abortions.
That’s so Planned Parenthood can get higher prices in its human organ trafficking scheme, selling baby hearts, livers, and spleens to the highest bidders.
Unpacking the absurd lies in this bill …
In addition to the obscenities mentioned above, HR 12 and its Senate companion bill, S 701, are outrageous.
Section 2.8 asserts that abortion creates “better maternal bonding.” How, I wonder, does a woman “better bond” with a dead child?
Section 2.11 claims that state abortion bans prevent women from receiving “potentially lifesaving treatment for ectopic pregnancies and miscarriage management.” But that is a bald-faced lie! Treatment for ectopic pregnancies and miscarriages is NOT the same procedure as an abortion, and nowhere in the U.S. have those lifesaving treatments been banned.
Sections 2.17 claims that abortion bans cause a loss of “liberty, dignity, bodily autonomy, equality, due process, privacy, health, and freedom from cruel and inhumane treatment.”
But again, at least one person in the abortion scheme loses every time. And having one’s brains scrambled, spine severed, and/or arms and legs unceremoniously yanked off before the head leaves the womb seems to me to be the ultimate in “inhumane treatment.”
Section 2.20 states, “Abortion is one of the safest medical procedures in the United States.” But abortion is NEVER safe for the child. With each abortion performed, at least one person winds up dying.
But perhaps most eye popping of the federal abortion bill’s demonstrably false claims is found in Sections 2.12 and 2.13. In those sections, the abortion advocates claim that abortion bans are racist in nature and primarily hurt minorities.
In overturning Roe, the Supreme Court referenced Liberty Counsel’s amicus brief that detailed the racist eugenic origins of the abortion movement, as well as the ongoing genocide of black and brown children through abortion.
Section 2.12 claims that access to abortion “has always been deficient in the United States for Black, Indigenous, Latina/x, Asian American and Pacific Islander, and People of Color (BIPOC) and their families.” But that is a lie!
Margaret Sanger’s writings show quite clearly that she wanted to stop the proliferation of black and poor people, whom she deemed the “human weeds” of society. Further, the overwhelming majority of abortion clinics are in black and brown neighborhoods, revealing the specific demographic Planned Parenthood and its allies are targeting.
Further, the section claims that abortion is “reproductive justice,” and that creating the right to kill a child will somehow make up for the “forcible removal of Indigenous children” that happened in the 19th century.
Section 2 reveals this bill’s insanity. Section 3 lowers the boom.
In Section 3, the bill states that any and all restrictions, or any and all rules, laws, and policies that might delay an abortion must be erased. That means that ultrasound laws, which have saved many children, will be eliminated. Parental rights also will be eliminated. Section 3 also insists that state and local regulations that force abortion clinics to meet the same health and safety standards as any other surgical center should be abolished. Any law that could make abortion “more difficult to access” would be gone.
The bill states that any restriction based on the age of the unborn child must be overturned. Laws like Florida’s “Heartbeat Law” and even the federal partial birth abortion ban will be overturned, and unlimited abortion on demand up until birth will be the law of this American land.
So who is really being “protected” in this bill?
Section 2.10 admits what this bill is REALLY about. It claims that abortion bans reduce patient access to health care services, including “contraceptive services,” “sexually transmitted disease testing,” and “LGBTQ” services. In other words, it refers to the services Planned Parenthood offers in addition to its primary profit center — baby killing.
HR 12 has 213 co-sponsors, which means the pro-abortion crowd only needs to convince ONE Republican to vote their way to make unlimited abortion the law of the land. Congress needs to hear from you NOW demanding they hold the line against Planned Parenthood and its baby-killing schemes. Tell Congress to VOTE NO on HR 12 and S 701!
Typical action for the Army of Satan who can’t stand a day to go by without babies being slaughtered. Army of Satan whose members are also include members of the Democratic party.
“inconvenient”
That is actually the word I intended to use.
Absolutely.
The Republicans should lean into this issue and rightly call the Democrat party the party of evil, and the party of death, and most importantly equate abortion with slavery.
Abortion legally codifies a baby as personal property, and disproportionately kills girls and babies of color.
Next time some leftist nag utters; “is a woman’s right”, ask her; “what if the unborn child is female?”
It’s like a scene from the movie “SCANNERS”
"Now, the abortion industry is going for a bigger prize — federal legislation to force every state to wipe away all abortion restrictions [??? emphasis added]. "
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
The author of the referenced article doesn't seem to understand that the federal government doesn't have the constitutionally enumerated authority to say ANYTHING about abortion, including no power to tax and spend for abortions.
Here's an example how abortion might be written into the 1st Amendment.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; [or dealing with abortion directly or indirectly;] or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
In other words, the Court's decision in Roe v. Wade was a MAJOR constitutional scandal imo, desperate Democrats and RINOs then seizing the opportunity to promise politically correct "right" have an abortion to effectively buy votes.
That means we can negate pervert marriage then.
“Pro-life people need to publicize partial birth abortion pictures!!!! It is that easy!”
How, tv ads? Stations will not run them.
Web ads? Google won’t run them.
Social media? Facebook, Instagram, Snap Chat, won’t happen there either.
X? I wouldn’t count on it.
Truth Social? That’s it.
I saw a bumper sticker that said *It’s easy to be pro-abortion when you’re not the one being killed*.
It doesn’t matter. It works either way.
It isn’t a “civil right” either.
“ If this passes, it’s time to turn out the lights on this country. I would be very surprised if God’s judgment is withheld any more.”
At this point, the complete obliteration of this country would be a net positive for humanity.
It’s beginning to look that way. Otherwise, we take the rest of the world with us.
(Democrats Sponsor Bill for Abortions Up to Birth That Eliminates Every Pro-Life)
Almighty God will not forget.
Revelation 20:12-15
New King James Version
12 And I saw the dead, small and great, standing before God, and Books were opened. And another Book was opened, which is the Book of Life. And the dead were judged according to their works, by the things which were written in the books.
13 The sea gave up the dead who were in it, and Death and Hades delivered up the dead who were in them. And they were judged, each one according to his works.
14 Then Death and Hades were cast into the Lake of Fire. This is the Second Death.
15 And anyone not found written in the Book of Life was cast into the Lake of Fire.
🔥🔥🔥
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation+20%3A12-15&version=NKJV
>
Hey, if people want change I am all for it, make Abortion rights a new Amendment to the Constitution and lets get to it. Otherwise, 10th Amendment.
>
10th? You left out A1S8 & ‘abortion’ isn’t in that list for D.C. to even THINK about.
Shame there’s no counter to the (D) party, currently elected let alone in the majority, that actually enforces & adheres to the Constitution *shrug*
Maybe FR+ just needs to vote in more/better “conservatives”, instead of those ‘conserving’ the status quo
It was NEVER a ‘civil right’ to begin.
Hard to ‘codify’ that which Congress has ZERO authority (REF: A1S8 vs. 9/10/14th A.)
This is EXACTLY how/why the ‘right’ loses...EVERY topic of debate: Negate your own point (”It’s a State matter, but...”) a/o concede the oppositions talking points & begin @ STEP 2+ *facepalm*
Left/Stat/Global-ists: Congress has the ability...
Counter: By WHAT authority again?
(LSG): The Constitution
(C): Which Art/Sec/Cl? REF: A1S8 vs. (list Amendments) that specify otherwise.
(LSG): Uhhhh...The People overwhelmingly...
(C): Then pass an Amendment. The ‘majority’s’ wishes are moot. Like all other Rights, those of {X} end when they infringe upon those of another/others.
I'm merely addressing Congress' ability to pass any laws on abortion absent Roe. Without Roe, Congress simply has no policing authority to change state laws regarding abortion either way.
They’ll have to fight the states. SCOTUS said this is a state issue, and the red states will likely fight it.
___________________________________________________
I’m not sure it means that the issue can be settled only by state legislatures. It probably implies that the issue can be settled by federal legislatures as well. I’m hoping that both parties remain sober on this and leave it to the states (at least for now). This country is already tearing itself apart because everything has to be nationalized and imposed on the rest of the states.
Late afternoon BUMP
(For people to share hopefully)
🛐🙏✝️
>
I’m merely addressing Congress’ ability to pass any laws on abortion absent Roe. Without Roe, Congress simply has no policing authority to change state laws regarding abortion either way.
>
I fail to note Congress giving even 2 sh!ts about their lawful authority to begin (just REF: the latest ‘foreign aide’ bill, or FISA ‘improvement’/anti-4th)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.