To: Jonty30
The courts issue edicts against “rules” with boring regularity. In this case, it’s probably not a bad ruling. The NCAA is losing its grip as a cartel that has always operated in a questionable legal gray area.
Imagine if you’re a doctor who takes a new job at another hospital … only to have your state medical licensing board tell you that you must sit out for a year before working at the new job. That kind of idiocy wouldn’t last 8 seconds in a courtroom.
5 posted on
03/26/2024 2:27:39 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
(If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
To: Alberta's Child
If the rule is unfair, it should be overturned. However, I do see many disadvantages in giving inexperienced athletes too much power in this area as well. The majority of college athletes don’t go pro and giving them too much right now would hurt their scholastic future, imo.
Although I realize that college athleticism is more pro in today’s world anyway.
6 posted on
03/26/2024 2:56:19 AM PDT by
Jonty30
(Do you know why I'm always right? It's because I know everything. )
To: Alberta's Child
Non compete clauses keep doctors from practicing all the time
18 posted on
03/26/2024 4:53:29 AM PDT by
Dick Vomer
( (2 Timothy 4:7 "deo duce ferro comitantes" <p><b></B><P> <img src="">)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson