Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jonty30
The courts issue edicts against “rules” with boring regularity. In this case, it’s probably not a bad ruling. The NCAA is losing its grip as a cartel that has always operated in a questionable legal gray area.

Imagine if you’re a doctor who takes a new job at another hospital … only to have your state medical licensing board tell you that you must sit out for a year before working at the new job. That kind of idiocy wouldn’t last 8 seconds in a courtroom.

5 posted on 03/26/2024 2:27:39 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

If the rule is unfair, it should be overturned. However, I do see many disadvantages in giving inexperienced athletes too much power in this area as well. The majority of college athletes don’t go pro and giving them too much right now would hurt their scholastic future, imo.

Although I realize that college athleticism is more pro in today’s world anyway.


6 posted on 03/26/2024 2:56:19 AM PDT by Jonty30 (Do you know why I'm always right? It's because I know everything. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

Non compete clauses keep doctors from practicing all the time


18 posted on 03/26/2024 4:53:29 AM PDT by Dick Vomer ( (2 Timothy 4:7 "deo duce ferro comitantes" <p><b></B><P> <img src="">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson