[Jonty30]

What’s the point of having rules if they can be discarded by court order?

[kiryandil]

anarcho-tyranny

[Alberta's Child]

The courts issue edicts against “rules” with boring regularity. In this case, it’s probably not a bad ruling. The NCAA is losing its grip as a cartel that has always operated in a questionable legal gray area.

Imagine if you’re a doctor who takes a new job at another hospital … only to have your state medical licensing board tell you that you must sit out for a year before working at the new job. That kind of idiocy wouldn’t last 8 seconds in a courtroom.

[Adder]

What’s the point of having rules if they are arbitrary by the issuance of waivers?

[EEGator]

To sow discontent.