Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/20/2024 6:10:31 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Red Badger

Court Insanity ,LOL


2 posted on 03/20/2024 6:12:16 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

So an appellate court can now over-rule the Supreme Court???

My, oh my! Have we ever got things backwards under Slo-Jo’s watch!


3 posted on 03/20/2024 6:13:50 AM PDT by Oscar in Batangas (An Honors Graduate from the Don Rickles School of Personal Verbal Intercourse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

So an appellate court can now over-rule the Supreme Court???

My, oh my! Have we ever got things backwards under Slo-Jo’s watch!


4 posted on 03/20/2024 6:13:50 AM PDT by Oscar in Batangas (An Honors Graduate from the Don Rickles School of Personal Verbal Intercourse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I can’t believe SCOTUS is allowing the botton tier Feral fags push them around. I always thought they were Supreme. I guess not.


5 posted on 03/20/2024 6:13:52 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Could a "caravan" of freeloading U.S. citizens be able to make it into Mexico before they are shot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The Fifth Circuit is an INFERIOR court to the Supreme Court, and therefore they CANNOT countermand them.


6 posted on 03/20/2024 6:14:05 AM PDT by fwdude (.When unarmed Americans are locked up for protesting a stolen election, you know it was stolen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Isn’t Ezra one of the punkass “Let’s lynch Trump!” Feral commie punks?


7 posted on 03/20/2024 6:15:34 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Could a "caravan" of freeloading U.S. citizens be able to make it into Mexico before they are shot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Texas just be Texas and git r dun.


8 posted on 03/20/2024 6:16:07 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Bear in mind that there are at least 25 State Governors who are behind the State of Texas concerning the border dispute with the Fed Gov.


11 posted on 03/20/2024 6:18:07 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Texas is not about where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind and Attitude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Sigh. I hope that this gets resolved soon. Just having this law in effect would perhaps lessen illegal immigration into Texas, knowing that arrest, not just deportation or release into society, is a distinct possibility. It might simply redirect immigration to Arizona or California. Even getting into the U.S. through Arizona or California might help Texas, though. Regardless of where you come across the board, you could still be arrested in Texas if you decide to try to live in Texas.


12 posted on 03/20/2024 6:18:26 AM PDT by Engraved-on-His-hands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The case was decided in SC 6-3, but two of the judges in the majority gave them a loophole saying they would be interested in the opinion of the lower court on it. The lower court took the bait and challenged.


16 posted on 03/20/2024 6:21:28 AM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The federal government has the Article I, Section 8 power of naturalization.

States lost the positive power of immigration in 1808, but still retain the power to block it IMO.


17 posted on 03/20/2024 6:21:46 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The Supreme Ct. has not ruled in favor of the Texas law.
The Supreme Ct. has not ruled against the Texas law.

The Supreme Ct. has refused to get involved in the appeals process and has refused to issue any emergency stays. This has disappointed supporters of the Texas law, it has disappointed the Biden Admin who are against the Texas law.

The imbecile press has spun this as the Supreme Ct. ruling for or against the Texas law, and the headlines have been misleading (as usual).

The case isn’t even before the Supreme Ct. yet, so everyone unlax.


18 posted on 03/20/2024 6:24:03 AM PDT by Roadrunner383 (m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
This is headed in the direction of what the German Nazis did, they setup their own court system that operated outside of their normal courts.

"No one F_cks with a Biden".

20 posted on 03/20/2024 6:25:48 AM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

How in the hell can SB4 “conflict” with “Federal immigration laws” when there aren’t any “Federal immigration laws” anymore. “Immigration” is a friggin’ Old West saloon free for all run by the Dung Beetle Party’s voter registration department. Show me one Federal Immigration law. THERE ISN’T ANY!!!!


22 posted on 03/20/2024 6:29:57 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Could a "caravan" of freeloading U.S. citizens be able to make it into Mexico before they are shot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
David Alan Ezra (born June 27, 1947)[1] is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii. Since January 2013, Ezra has been designated by the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court to serve on the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division to help ease the heavy workload for the federal judges in Texas. Judge Ezra is often designated to sit on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals where he holds the record for the most designated sittings of any judge in that Court’s history.


23 posted on 03/20/2024 6:30:33 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Go with SCOTUS, ignore the fifth circus.


25 posted on 03/20/2024 6:30:58 AM PDT by nonliberal (Z.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Perhaps civil law defendants & plaintiffs should be able to get judge blocks just like criminal law defendants get juror blocks.


32 posted on 03/20/2024 6:38:23 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The US Judicial Branch has assumed the throne and we no longer need the Legislative or Executive Branch ... oh, except for Biden who just ignores any Judicial ruling he doesn’t like.


35 posted on 03/20/2024 6:43:44 AM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

So why ask Mexico to “accept” repatriations? Round up the illegals, reform them into foot caravans like when they arrive, and force them to walk back the way they came. If they refuse to move their feet in the right direction, load them onto trucks, drive them into Mexico, and dump them. Keep this up until Mexico builds a wall.


36 posted on 03/20/2024 6:44:39 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Finally....
One that has teeth.
A minor re-wording should do the trick.
Instead of arrest (why would Texas want to detain hundreds of thousands in their prison system) transport to the nearest federal facility.
Cloward-Piven.
Overwhelm the system.


38 posted on 03/20/2024 6:48:08 AM PDT by joe fonebone (And the people said NO! The End)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson