Posted on 03/19/2024 11:18:32 AM PDT by janetjanet998
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed Texas to enforce a contentious new law that gives local police the power to arrest migrants.
The conservative-majority court, with three liberal justices dissenting, rejected an emergency request made by the Biden administration, which said states have no authority to legislate on immigration, an issue the federal government has sole authority over.
Thank you. Worth repeating. We need to take back the language. I prefer “illegal aliens” but “illegal immigrants” works.
BTTT
BTTT
BTTT
BTTT
Shouldn’t take long for a certain group with a lot of combat experience to convert their AKs to full auto. Bomb belts they will still have to hide.
“The conservative-majority court, with three liberal justices dissenting, rejected an emergency request made by the Biden administration, which said states have no authority to legislate on immigration, an issue the federal government has sole authority over.”
The Biden administration is full of hypcrites when it comes to federal immigration enforcement efforts. They have not a single problem with “sanctuary city” laws thwarting the efforts of ICE to detain and deport illegals. They have no leg to stand on objecting to states enforcing immigration laws Biden refuses to enforce.
Florida to keep out the hatians and Oklahoma to cut the I-35 and I-40 express to disrupt the illegals from freely moving around the country once they get across.
I'd like to see Arizona counties do this too, but the state will block them I fear. New Mexico and kalifornia are lost causes.
SCOTUS has now considered the regime's arguments and lifted its stay to allow the appeals court's decision to stand.
So the net result is that the law can go into effect pending the outcome of the trial. Note that SCOTUS made no decision on the merits of the case.
I would guess the 5th Circuit will uphold the state's arguments and SCOTUS will get the case again.
“A surge of unauthorized immigration plainly is not an invasion within the meaning of the State War Clause,” Prelogar wrote.”
Amazing. Every word of that is just wrong….
I want that new Arizona law to happen so people can shoot illegals trespassing on their land.
I see that sort of law as opening up various forms of recreational tourism.
As the dissent in a similar Arizona case put it a few years ago, the Federal courts ought not to give the Executive carte blanche to break or ignore the law using the excuse of Federal pre-emption.
Shoulder or European mount?
This is good news.
Different tours, but might occur concurrently, based on staffing.
Build the wall.
Deport them all.
That was just a temporary stay order..................
“6-3 decision with the usual suspects dissenting”
Liberal women of varying colors and intelligence.
Build the wall.
Deport them all.
~~~
This is great news, but it’s just Texas.
California will soon become the new main thoroughfare for illegals, and California will not be doing their own enforcement.
“What changed?”
That’s what I was wondering.
The stay yesterday was termed “indefinitely,” right. Looks as if they did not want to specify an efffective term, as they knew the ruling was imminent.
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against InvasionUS Const., Art. IV, Sec. 4.
arrest and DEPORT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.