Posted on 03/10/2024 6:58:45 PM PDT by jacknhoo
Residents of the Evergreen State will soon be able to report their neighbors for expressing “bias.”
The governor of Washington is poised to sign a bill that ends free speech in certain counties – and the rest of the state probably sometime thereafter. Recently passed by the Washington state legislature, this measure creates a “bias incident hotline” to the State Attorney General’s Office. You read that right: American citizens in the northwestern state will soon be able to turn in their friends, neighbors, family members, or even strangers for not only physical “hate crimes” but also expressions of “bias.” Substitute Senate Bill 5427 is now on the governor’s desk. Its supposed purpose is “supporting people who have been targeted or affected by hate crimes and bias incidents.” To that end, it establishes “a reporting hotline” and sets up a mechanism for “tracking hate crimes and bias incidents” that will be overseen by the Washington state attorney general’s office.
Criminalizing Free Speech?
To be clear, this isn’t merely about going after people who have allegedly committed physical “hate crimes.” It also targets reported instances of “a person’s hostile expression of animus toward another person, relating to the other person’s actual or perceived characteristics…” Literally, the hotline gives people a way of informing on others supposedly guilty of thought crimes – or, perhaps, speech crimes.
The bill, as passed, does make it clear that these “bias incidents” do not include “expressions of opposition or support for the actions or policies of a foreign or domestic government protected under free speech.” So, sure, one is still free to criticize an elected official, but express any opinion someone else decides is aimed at an individual because of that person’s “actual or perceived characteristics” and one could find oneself in the AG’s crosshairs.
It is easy to see, then, that any expression of opposition to, say, transgender ideology, would get someone reported to the hotline. Free speech – at least in the three Washington counties to which this program will initially be rolled out – appears under threat. If one cannot say anything that another person of a different race, sex, religion, or sexual orientation finds offensive in some way without being reported to the attorney general’s office, then one no longer enjoys the constitutionally protected right to freedom of speech.
Supporters of the bill might argue that this isn’t the US Congress making a law that restricts free speech, so it can’t be unconstitutional. The Washington Constitution, however, also protects free speech. Article I, Section 5: “Every person may freely speak, write and publish on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right.” Getting away from the sheer creepiness of people being reported to the authorities for merely expressing an opinion, Rep. Cyndy Jacobsen (R-Puyallup) succinctly pointed out the ominous flaw in this bill. “I think it’s difficult to put things into law which look at the intent of people rather than the actions that they take,” she said. Rep. Jim Walsh (R-Aberdeen) agrees, saying: “If a crime is a crime, if someone has been assaulted, if property has been damaged, then the proper recourse is to contact law enforcement and pursue a remedy, pursue justice in that way.”
A Dangerous Road
The potential scope of abuse with this new hotline is vast – especially since any identifying personal information provided to the hotline is “confidential and exempt from public inspection, copying, or disclosure.” Neither is that information to be included in any written reports. That means if anyone wanted to go after someone whose political opinions they don’t like, they could, conceivably, fabricate a “hate crime” or “bias incident” out of nothing. In fact, this new law, which takes effect on Jan. 1, 2025, exempts so much information from public disclosure that there will be no accountability at all to the people of the Evergreen State. After all, faking hate crimes has become common practice for the progressive left.
When any elected (or appointed) official says that restricting free speech is necessary in order to increase public safety, it is crucial for rational people to think about how far such restrictions will go. “Public safety” and “public health emergency” are deliberately vague terms that can be used to justify any violation of individual rights. Perhaps free speech isn’t a priority for them after all.
Many of us said when the idea for “hate crimes” was first offered up for legislation that if enacted it would only be a matter of time before the idea would morph into the establishment of thought crimes.
My wife and I were born and raised in Washington State... Citizens who grew up here have been overrun. People like us have become a minority here. This started out from people escaping from California. When we go to the stores near our home, often there seem to be more people loudly speaking foreign languages than English. Our state is well known as a sanctuary state to “new arrivals”.
So yes we are planning on moving to another state... forced out by policies that we have no control over.
“FIRE is pleased to announce an important legislative victory for free speech in Washington state. Senate Bill 5427, which would have created a bias reporting system for the entire state, failed to advance out of the Senate Ways and Means committee.”
According to the State legislature’s web page, they have managed to get this abomination out of committee...
IF true: “only the federal government can create or enforce immigration law”
Then it follows, that U.S. “Sanctuary Cities” are un-constitutional.
And other considerations.
In my suburb of Seattle it is now over 42% of the people were born in another country. Most of them have good jobs and are probably decent people. BUT - their views on social, cultural, political, etc. norms are not American.
Hopefully we’ll live long enough to wake up and do something about it.
I stay away from liberal shxtholes so irrelevant to me.
That would include Biden for saying that a Jewish prime minister should come to Jesus.
Problem with that, caller ID, the person would end up being SWATTED,
True- ask to borrow a liberals phone lol
I actually spoke to Bird at the WA State Fair lest fall. He seems like a smart cookie, and put forth some really well-thought ideas.
As it is, I’m not sure I trust Reichert. He seems more of an Establishment guy. I do know the GOP in Olympia are behind him, and that’s a big Red Flag to me.
Another reason I like Bird is that my uber-lib sister utterly hates him. She jokingly (I hope) told me she’d shoot me if I voted for him.
So, I guess you could say I’m a Bird-man.
A wise decision!
It took several generations to get into this mess and it will twice as many to even "begin" recovering some of the lost freedoms & liberties...
Yeah - I GOT BIAS.
what about it?
The founding fathers would have been shooting bullets LONG before this!
The founding fathers would have been shooting bullets LONG before this!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.