In 1991, curiously enough, after the Soviet debacle in Afghanistan, Russians under Michael Gorbachev supported Bush the Elder's western coalition in Gulf War I.
But by 2003 Vladimir Putin opposed Bush the Younger's Gulf War II, and our pro-Russian repeaters here have happily adopted the same stance.
The Old Soviets' relations with Saddam Hussein were... "complicated" and on-again, off-again, largely due to the Soviets' incompatible desires to also maintain good relations with Iran.
During an "on-again" period, the early 1970s, Iraq received aid & training from the Soviet KGB and East Germany's Stasi.
The Iraq-Iran war led Saddam to seek allies among western powers, notably France and the USA.
This cooled relations with Russia enough that by the 1991 Gulf War I, Michael Gorbachev sided against Iraq.
But by 2003, Vlad the Invader had restored Russia's relations with Iraq enough to oppose Gulf War II, at least verbally.
Today, 20+ years after Gulf War II, Iraq remains a poster child of our pro-Russian neo-isolationists, for what and who was wrong about "neo-conservatism".
Even on Free Republic, whose posters strongly supported the War on Terror, including in Iraq, some now claim to have opposed "neo-cons" from the beginning.
One person who's never publicly mocked neo-conservatism or "neo-cons" as such is Donald Trump.
Yes, Trump calls the Iraq war a "big fat mistake", and derides some (i.e., John Bolton) as "war mongers".
Plus, Trump opposes "nation-building".
Most important, says Trump, we should have taken some of Iraq's oil to help pay for the war.
So, what is Iraq's situation today?
By comparison, ongoing US support helps Iraqis to have done relatively well.
Nothing less than total surrender
“In 1991, curiously enough, after the Soviet debacle in Afghanistan, Russians under Michael Gorbachev supported Bush the Elder’s western coalition in Gulf War I.”
You believe that? I sure as hell don’t!
Gorbachev’s Soviet Union was broke. It was fiscally defeated. It was simply easier to proclaim Perestroika than admit defeat.
The Russian diplomats and military advisers were shuttling weekly to Baghdad to give advice and intel for maximizing Coalition casualties. Even tho the Iraqi air force and air defense was never developed to oppose Western air power they knew enough about it and its systems to significantly oppose it and reduce its effects.
The Russians realized there were two sides in the war and played both to obtain their goals. Minimize Iraqi destruction and maximize coalition casualties. WhTF do you think gave the Iraqis satellite-based targeting solutions for their Scuds? You think those were INS-based range and bearing shots? And I KNOW KGB provided all kinds of support from 2003 onwards. Even bumped into one of their 3-man teams in BIAP heading south to Basrah weeks before the EFPs started being used there.
No, Russians/KGB were deep and dirty in basically all Iraq operations since the 1970s including the Iran war (atheist KGB protege vs. deist Khomeini.
Not all #Ukranians are willing to be led away to their ☠️ by #Mobilization squads.
A guy was moving his horses when he was approached by 🇺🇦 kidnappers. The passer by car came to the rescue and together they drove them away.#Ukraine fights back! pic.twitter.com/q0uolAWf9R— Arthur Morgan (@ArthurM40330824) March 7, 2024