Posted on 03/03/2024 8:23:46 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
Yesterday she got 0 votes in Missouri, 1.7 percent of the caucus votes in Michigan and all of 12.2 percent of the Idaho caucus. She is about as successful as Pat Paulsen and Harold Stassen.
Competitive for WHOM, Nikita? The demorat national strategy to defeat the People of the United States? That one?
<< she is planning to stay in the race “as long as …..>>
….the Globalist Uniparty money keeps rolling in.
If I were interviewing her she would have started crying:
cgbg: “Nikki. There were 122 delegates in play yesterday. President Trump got 122 of them. You got zero of them. How can you sit there and look me in the eye and look this audience in the eye and claim that is competitive?”
Nikki: bla bla bla bla bla
cgbg: “Nikki. Every poll says that every American wants people who lead them to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Why don’t you tell the truth now about your performance yesterday. Do you take any responsibility for the dismal failure of your campaign to date?”
Nikki: (we don’t know what happened next—there would some very loud noises and screams but the camera was shut off...)
Lol.
How about this thought: Haley is still in the race because she wants to prevent Trump from getting elected, and because she is getting contributions from democrats who want the same thing.
I’m betting she forms a third party. That will take votes from Trump.
And she’s failing at that. Badly. Expensively for all the WEFtards funding her.
Who is WE? DEMOCRATS and RINOS?
Who is WE? DEMOCRATS and RINOS?
IF shehad ANY CHANCE of winning, the DEMOCRATS WOULD BRING UP THE NBC AGAINST her!
You win the Internet today ! She is doing something really nasty for money. What do you call a woman who does something really nasty for money?
I have read a lot of articles about Haley supporters—and many of the folks who voted for her are either Democrats or leaning Democratic who only voted for her to cause mischief for Republicans.
Of the Republicans who voted for her most say (in one survey I saw 90%) that they would support President Trump in the general election.
Even if she ran as a third party (which I do not think is feasible for a bunch of boring logistical reasons) she would be another John Anderson—taking small numbers of voters from both major candidates—a wash.
The real third party threat is RFK Jr. running in all fifty states on the libertarian party ticket.
That would crush Democrats hopes and dreams and turn the election into a Trump landslide.
RFK Jr. is polling in the ten percent range in many polls.
Delusional. Lady, there is NO competition. Sit down.
I believe Marianne Williamson is doing better against Biden (than Nikki Haley is against Trump) in the Democrat primaries despite having suspended and unsuspended her campaign.
But Marianne Williamson gets far less attention and media coverage than Nikki Haley.
LOL
she hasn’t been competitive ever in this race!
If that were true, she never would have entered the race. She’s not in it to win it. She’s there to try to weaken trump. She’s a democRAT
I suspect she was 'buttered' up in the same fashion Liz Cheney was buttered up. Heady stuff for conservatives
. Conservatives don't know how to deal with DEMOCRAT/MSM/MSNBC fawning. Guess that's an advantage for those folks being in bed with corrupt 'intelligence' - they learn the 'butter up' tricks.
No. The reason she is still in the race is because the GOPe is still hoping and expecting that Trump ends up getting disqualified and jailed or forced into poverty by all the court cases against him. Haley will be the GOPe ‘designated replacement’ (read: ‘designated loser’) at that point. If she drops out, she can’t be slotted in place.
Hey now. She’s second to none.
Probably safer than being around that lunatic
I was about to post a similar reply. EXACTLY!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.