Posted on 02/26/2024 4:31:35 PM PST by cotton1706
(Excerpt) Read more at truthsocial.com ...
But also, Gold and Silver coin only.
Exactly, probably the most obvious instance. Thanks
NY specifically and only temporarily extended its statute of limitation specifically so that that lying hag could sue Trump them promptly changed it back.
If that isn’t the most clear cut case of a bill of attainder I don’t know what is.
As president can he launch nuclear strikes against area targets in NYC and Albany? Dig a trench between Mexico and USA ? I would go for that.
If that isn't the most clear cut case of a bill of attainder I don't know what is.
Not only was the law extension a Bill of Attainder, it was also an ex post facto law which is also unconstitutional.
A legislature CAN extend the time limits on a statute of limitation, but only for people who are still liable under the existing time period of the statute of limitation, not for those who are already past the time limit.
For example if the statuette of limitations on jay walking was two years, the time frame could be extended to 4 years - but only for those people who were still within the two year window. For those who already have had the statuette of limitations expire on their jay walking , they are in the clear and cannot be charged under the extended time frame.
Also, the Engoron prosecution of Trump is unconstitutional because it explicitly violates the Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts. the Trump Organization and the Deutsche Bank entered into a valid and legal contract.
The bank testified that all contract terms were satisfied by both parties and the contract was concluded.
There is not any indication that there was any breach of contract.
Legal contracts are sacrosanct and the government has not right to interfere in the execution of a lawful, valid contract. The terms of the contract were mutually agreed to by both parties. the government has not right to interfere.
Engoron misapplied the law in such a way that it impaired the obligations of contracts and is thus unconstitutional. .
Worse. They have made it fluid and what ever they want it to be.
Looks that way.
Oh, they’ll TAKE your ‘money’, they’ll just give you no change back.
When’s the judge going to flip this coin over, and get JUSTICE! for those who - for what ever reason - sold their stuff for LESS that it was ‘worth’?
WHAT?
A river isn't enough??
As strange as it seams, I won’t actually rule out something
like this being used to denigrate and delegitimize home
owners, something the Left truly hates.
as well as Clash of Clans and SimCity...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.