Posted on 02/19/2024 2:50:13 PM PST by george76
Now They are saying that Trump has to pay &5000 down just to Appeal. This is so clearly election manipulation. The Supreme court should be involved. How can a state nullify a candidate like this. They should at least have a stay until the Appeals court can rule.
I do not recognize the validity of a law that allows a person to
be prosecuted if there was no harmed party.
This is soviet show trial territory. Whether you like Trump or not, no person should have to endure the level of vindictive persecution that Trump has to endure.
Especially if it’s being perpetrated by the federal government. Even being a case in NY, this is coming straight from the top.
Normally, victims get restitution for damages they suffered. Who was damaged? Who gets paid?
This was just a money-grab by New York state, and they should be punished for it.
It's the New York legal system that are the racketeers in this mess.
-PJ
I understand your reasoning, and on the face of it can’t
argue against your point.
Now it may be that certain loans were carried out with
a percentage rate the court thinks should have been higher,
and perhaps they are awarding funds to restore their claimed
loss (claimed by the court). I just don’t know.
A lender and a client came to an agreement. Business was
conducted under free will. Both parties were satisfied
with the transaction. I have no idea how a court can
just jump in and toss all that out, to take a person they
loathe down.
Absolutely disgusting of James and that nasty judge. We all knew what was going to happen because neither of the two held back their opinions on the Trumps. Especially President Trump. They had decided the verdict before the trial!
“In electing openly partisan prosecutors such as James and District Attorney Alvin Bragg, voters have shown a preference for political prosecutions and investigations.”
Right there is the crux of the whole issue. As long as the vote counters keep putting these a$$clowns into office, there will be these despicable outcomes.
The prosecution was obscene to begin with. The verdict moreso. The award incomprehensible.
I already have my first line items:
ITEM: Client meeting (I was looking forward to this trip, but I informed the client today that I'll be signing in online instead)
2/20/24 -- $151 ... hotel for one-night stay (taxes included)
2/20/24 -- $10 toll
2/21/24 -- $12 (estimated lunch expense)
2/21/24 -- $10 toll (return trip)
---------------------------------------
TOTAL -- $183
Turley reveals himself as a naif.
Is there a name given to a situation where the judge can use his position and his hate, to do a personal hit on someone.
Is someone on this as I speak?
The repub house was makimg a statement and more.. This morning.
Truckers are not delivering to NY..
Anything else?
Dear Alberta’s Child, 10$ tolls?, $12 lunch? I take it that you haven’t been to NYC in a while.
I've taken this same trip about a dozen times in the last two years. The only thing that varies (seasonally) is the price of the hotel room.
Truly will still vote for them. And Biden.
The trial was one long legal
obscenity as well.
About the only thing missing in this NY trial judgement is a firm date in the Lubyanka cellar with Vasily Mikhailovich Blokhin.
That train left the station long ago, Mr. Turley.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.