[Vigilanteman]

When hundreds of thousands of ballots turn up in a few carefully selected locations long after the polls close and there is little to no oversight on their counting or even their origin, how can anyone declare that the results were accurate?

Yes, you might say that the fraud was not widespread because it was carefully targeted, but that's about as far as one can go.

[Red Badger]

There should be GOP watchers at every polling place just counting the actual numbers of people who come in to vote. Then if the number for that precinct is greater than that plus the absentees, then there is fraud..................

[gibsonguy]

This is correct. They were careful to cheat just enough which is what they always do.

[Deo volente]

They stole Pennsylvania in the dead of night. I went to bed with President Trump ahead by 900,000 votes, then woke up seven hours later with him losing the state.
A lot of shenanigans at 3 am.

[Robert DeLong]

Actually, you can say whatever you want as long as there is no one to counter what you say.

[Danie_2023]

“Yes, you might say that the fraud was not widespread because it was carefully targeted, but that’s about as far as one can go.”

Because the fraud and the steal was carefully planned. Carefully pre-planned. And I’m betting they’ll try what worked perfectly for them again. What’s to stop them?