Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Black Alabama man, 24, tasered by female cop who told him 'your b**** a** ain't so tough now' breaks silence on 'traumatizing' arrest ordeal where he was also wrongly held on fentanyl charge
Daily Mail ^ | December 8, 2023 | Ishita Srivastava

Posted on 12/08/2023 8:38:45 PM PST by Angelino97

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-234 next last
To: roving
Most people do not realize it either.

They think every order the cop gives must be obeyed under pain of torture.

The police are actually very limited in what they can make you do but that is not the way they show it on TV. And way to many people watch too much TV.

21 posted on 12/08/2023 9:17:40 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Keep America Beautiful by keeping Canadian Trash Out. Deport Jennifer Granholm!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: skr

Tasing a handcuffed person requires no speculation.

It’s intolerable cruelty every single time.

Not knowing that and casting doubt leaves folks knowing exactly with whom they’re dealing reply after reply.


22 posted on 12/08/2023 9:21:54 PM PST by Freest Republican (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Angelino97

He was also charged with possession of a firearm as an ex felon and possession of marijuana. They kept referring to it as a citizen’s arrest. She may have been off duty or in another jurisdiction that was outside her jurisdiction of employment.


23 posted on 12/08/2023 9:26:57 PM PST by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

The human race is limited to not electrocuting handcuffed human beings.

They think white woman and low IQ, impulse control then impulsively post low IQ garbage.


24 posted on 12/08/2023 9:27:17 PM PST by Freest Republican (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
LOL, great advice.

See how many commands from a police officer you're legally allowed to disobey, and then test the limits.

Civilization, it;s either/or.

Not surprised to see you pushing that retarded idea, moron.

25 posted on 12/08/2023 9:28:13 PM PST by Trailerpark Badass (“There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach,” said one woman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
What are the demographics where you live?

Why do you feel compelled to be so vehement discussing US politics?

26 posted on 12/08/2023 9:30:05 PM PST by Trailerpark Badass (“There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach,” said one woman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: lightman

That’s a man, baby.


27 posted on 12/08/2023 9:33:48 PM PST by Bigg Red (Trump will be sworn in under a shower of confetti made from the tattered remains of the Rat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Trailerpark Badass
So to you civilization is obeying everything some citizen wearing a magic blue uniform says?

I would say we have vastly different ideas of what constitutes civilization then.

Because to me civilization is not having to bow down and grovel every time some minion of the government gets a wild hair.

In fact that is the entire reason for several amendments.

Perhaps you should immigrate back to Europe. They love the idea of having "betters" that you should obey.

As for me, if someone asks to speak to my master I would say the SOB has not been born yet.

28 posted on 12/08/2023 9:46:29 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Keep America Beautiful by keeping Canadian Trash Out. Deport Jennifer Granholm!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

Female cops tend to use their weapons more and are quick to be offended and exact revenge.


29 posted on 12/08/2023 9:50:53 PM PST by arthurus ( covfefe reno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: skr

You do not under ANY circumstances have to show your ID or identify yourself unless you are informed that you are being detained and for what purpose you are being detained. And also, women should not be in the field. PERIOD. I watch dozens of body cam footage that are released daily and it’s horrifying to watch how incompetent female officers are and how much danger they place themselves and others into by walking the beat. Police no longer ride in pairs and as such women can be easily overpowered and are much quicker to implement deadly force as a result. If true, this woman in no way should wear the uniform. Pfffft show an ID when no order of detainment or declaration of suspicion of a crime has been announced. I too would tell the cop to pound sand.


30 posted on 12/08/2023 9:52:26 PM PST by Jarhead9297
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Freest Republican
You would think that would be obvious.

The police are not "punishers". They are suppose to arrest people, conduct searches with the permission of a judge and investigate. I think the problem begins when we started calling them "law enforcement" and that gave them a skewed idea of what their job was.

Judge and jury are the ones who impose punishment.

The jobs were split apart for a reason.

31 posted on 12/08/2023 9:52:48 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Keep America Beautiful by keeping Canadian Trash Out. Deport Jennifer Granholm!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: Trailerpark Badass

You DO NOT have to show ID or identify yourself if the officer has not stated they are detaining you and state the crime you are under investigation for that is the purpose for the detainment. Period, end of story. If this turns out to be the case (as it appears thus far) the idiot female will be fired for incompetence and the gentleman should win a large settlement for being denied his civil liberties.


33 posted on 12/08/2023 10:00:47 PM PST by Jarhead9297
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Angelino97
He was charged with trafficking fentanyl, but the charge and its accompanying $500,000 bond were dropped after 'further testing' showed the substance in his possession was not the opioid drug.

How about the "news reporter" simply reports what the substance actually was?

Regards,

34 posted on 12/08/2023 10:44:07 PM PST by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trailerpark Badass
He was charged with trafficking fentanyl, but the charge and its accompanying $500,000 bond were dropped after 'further testing' showed the substance in his possession was not the opioid drug.
35 posted on 12/08/2023 10:44:58 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: skr

In some states you are required to identify yourself. You are not required to show ID.


36 posted on 12/08/2023 10:46:10 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Angelino97

IMHO I think she was being cruel. He was already handcuffed. Put him in the back of your patrol car!


37 posted on 12/08/2023 11:04:03 PM PST by quilterdebbie (We will endeavor to persevere!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

I think she is definitely in the danger zone on the matrix!


38 posted on 12/08/2023 11:04:50 PM PST by quilterdebbie (We will endeavor to persevere!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Agree!


39 posted on 12/08/2023 11:05:29 PM PST by quilterdebbie (We will endeavor to persevere!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: skr

> The officer has a right to know who he or she is dealing with. <

Sure, the officer would like to know. But the Fourth Amendment says the officer does not automatically have the right. We are not a “papers, please“ country.

The officer must be able to articulate probable cause.


40 posted on 12/08/2023 11:11:08 PM PST by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-234 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson