GOP senators demand answers on CIA whistleblower allegations of COVID-19 origins

GOP lawmakers sent a letter this week to CIA Director William Burns after a whistleblower claimed that analysts probing COVID-19 origins were offered money to alter their stance that the virus likely came from a Wuhan lab leak.

Sens. Rand Paul, R-Ky., Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., Rick Scott, R-Fla., and Ron Johnson, R-Wis., joined their House counterparts in demanding answers from Burns, such as all of the "documents and communications between or among the members of all iterations of the COVID Discovery Team(s) regarding the origins of COVID-19."

Paul told Fox News Digital in a statement Thursday, "This is one of the biggest cover-ups in our nation's history, and we deserve answers."

"Department of Energy scientists concluded COVID-19 came from a lab," Paul wrote. "FBI scientists concluded COVID-19 came from a lab. We've been told six of seven CIA scientists also concluded COVID-19 came from a lab but were paid to change their minds."

Watch a fed up Dr. David Martin address a near empty audience at the European Parliament fast forward to the 30:24 Minute Mark to begin directly with his speech

https://rumble.com/v3i004y-health-and-democracy-under-whos-propsed-rules.html

rough transcript follows:

Well, the translators are gone and the live stream is waning which means if we just listen to my colleague, Mattias, the best thing in the world would be to leave it you the people. Now it's up to you to share, what, clearly - based on the cavernous emptiness we see in all of these spaces (EU Parliament) is only going to be heard if you share it.

So it feels very appropriate that I should be the one with the quietest voice. But let's let that lion roar, shall we?

I'm done talking about Covid and I'm done talking about SARS Cov2. I'm done for a very simple reason. For 110 years we the people of the world have been lied to where a group of small number of criminal, industrial conspirators decided to subordinate the entirety of the human population for the purpose of their sinister plans to enrich themselves while impoverishing and killing the rest of humanity.

And I'm done being polite. We've long passed polite. When the words "acceptable death rate" become part of an industrial norm, we have lost the plot of humanity.

And that's not my words. Those were the words of the WHO and of Pfizer and of Moderna when they were given the authorization to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals .

Next slide
And I’m also not going to sugar coat this.
This is a criminal cartel.
We are acting as if there were some sort of redeemable qualities somewhere in some esoteric layer that somehow or another the WHO must have some salutatory benefit. Well, I’m going to tell you that since it’s formation in the 1940’s the WHO has been nothing more than a criminal cartel that has a sole and singular intent. And I will show you the document that proves what I’m saying. This is not an allegation. This is actually provable by their own words in their own hand. And they use a force that process to execute every one of their nefarious plans.
They begin by planning an exercise. Then they go to the business of funding that exercise. Then they create the rationale for the thing they are going to do. And then they deploy and profit from it. And in violation of 15 U.S. Code § 19 which, for those of you listening, coincidentally, started with the Clayton Act in the same year that the WHO in the United States, 1913, the same year the WHO’s progenitors also started. I find it fascinating they passed the Clayton Act in 1913 and we set in motion 110 years ago, the criminal conspiracy which we now call the World Health Organization, a hundred and ten years later. And in violation of TEFU or TfeU, I don’t know how to how to say it. TFEU, the treaty allegedly for the functioning of the European Union which I think needs to now be called the treaty for the dysfunctional European cabal. Article 101 unambiguously lays out the conditions that this was NEVER A PUBLIC HEALTH anything.
It was racketeering for the purpose of instilling terror to adapt the behavior of a population, PERIOD. That’s what it was. That’s what it always was.
We can come up with every theoretical argument we want to make about things but the problem even with the theory that we had an outbreak of something is falsifiable for the data from Zurich that shows us that in the year of the death pandemic of the globe life insurance companies paid $30 Billion less in claims.
Now if there is a medical professional or a social professional or anybody else who wants to debate that we could develop a virus cunningly that could find out your bank account, your insurance policy statements and whether you are paid up on your premiums – that’s a BIG ASK. It turns out that the data is unambiguous.
WE DID NOT HAVE A PANDEMIC. WE HAD GENOCIDE. And we need to call it what it is.
Next slide
When I say “we planned it” – let’s make sure we understand exactly the not-so-fine print of the ‘fine print’.
And I want to call your attention first to the right hand column of this slide. This is the 2011 data that the WHO, The Welcome Trust passed and The Gates Foundation did on their wonderful world wide program for malaria vaccines for children under the age of 6 months of age. And in their clinical trial it’s helpful to point out that they murdered 66 children in the ‘vaccine group’ and then cunningly used the term ‘control’ for a ‘control group’ in which they killed 28 children.
Now, the reason I said ‘murdered’ and the reason why I used that term is because that is exactly what it was because it turns out this ‘control group’ was not a saline injection. It was not some sort of innocuous innocent thing. It was actually a cocktail of other known pathogenic disease carrying injections. The ‘control group’ was known to kill people. And the experimental control group was actually, theoretically maybe going to kill people. And what we did was we actually went and murdered them all. And cunningly, under Article 5 Section 13, which I’ve put up on this slide, I want you to understand why I said, at it’s formation in 1947 when the WHO was funded and founded, it was funded and founded by people intending to commit a crime because of their own language.
Section 13 of Article 5 ends with the following statement:
“immunity from personal arrest or detention (blah, blah, blah) , immunity from legal process of every kind.”
image
Now, if you didn’t intend to do a crime why would you need to give yourself permanent and absolute immunity from every form of prosecution – and it’s worse – even investigation for prosecution of every kind?
People sit there and let’s pretend it’s like diplomatic immunity. Do you realize this isn’t even meeting the standard of diplomatic immunity?
This is a criminal organization who set in motion their own laws to protect themselves against crimes they knew they were going to commit.
And when I say they knew they were going to commit – I mean they knew it because their first director general, none other than Dr. René Sand who happened to be in the hospitality of the Germans in Dachau in 1940 (earlier) , in 1947, mysteriously with the largesse of the Rockefeller Foundation was nominated to become the first Director General of the WHO. And within 5 short years René Sand decided to authorize the real purpose of the WHO in writing.
By then, Director General Dr. Brock Chisholm who advocated for population control as it’s primary objective.
Does that sound like public health to anyone in this room? This is not public health.
This is the advancement of the same genocidal program that began with the Carnegie Foundation’s funding the eugenics office at Cold Spring Labs in the United States in 1913 under the philanthropy, ‘philanthropy’ of Andrew Carnegie.
People, stop fooling yourself.
We debate the leaves on the tree of what we call this pandemic thing but we are not going to the root. This was an organized crime, racketeering entity set up to give itself first absolute immunity and then execute its plans to make sure it controls who lives, who dies, and who gets any chance at life.
And if you think that I am somehow inflating numbers – let me be unambiguous. Under every treatment of tax provision, if I were to tell you that there is an 88% controlling interest in any organization you might conclude that that actually aggregates into a controlling interest. And it turns out that if we look at the foundations donations to the World Health Organization, 88% of those come from a single organization – The Gates Foundation.
That constitutes a violation of every competitiveness law in Europe and every competitiveness law in the United States.
This is absolutely not only NOT an independent charitably funded donation but more importantly under the tax laws on both sides of the Atlantic this constitutes directed donations which specifically are forbidden and do not have any place anywhere in the Charter of the World Health Organization or any of the UN affiliated organizations.
When I say this is a crime, I mean it’s a tax crime, a racketeering crime, a money laundering crime and now a racketeering crime leading to murder and global terrorism.
Next slide
I told you that the second thing after they plan it is they fund it. And why don’t we use the criminals language, in their own words because you know it’s the best way to say it.
When they actually planned the release the use of a biologically modified chimera associated with the model derived from corona virus they actually said the following: “to sustain the funding based be on the crisis we need to increase the public understanding for the need for medical counter measures such as a pan influenza and corona vaccine...”
Now let me pause for just one moment and let me remind you that the crisis we’re speaking of was a crisis of diminishing funding. There was no health crisis.
This was a crisis of their coffers starting to run dry. That’s the crisis.
And let’s read on:
“...the key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.”
That is officially the statement made by the conspiratorial cabal that by that time was the decade of vaccines put in motion in 2011 by the global preparedness monitoring board of the WHO and it was the funding base for Peter Daszak’s partnership with the chimeric production of pathogens both in North Carolina and in Wuhan.
So don’t tell me we have to do an investigation into where this came from. The criminals have admitted to it in their own words.
Next slide
And now we get the fun one that no one in Congress is willing to address which is the elephant in the room.
On October 21st, 2014, despite the multiple conversations between Senator Rand Paul and Anthony Fauci we’ve been told that Rand Paul has done everything he can to put Fauci on the ropes. He has had in his possession the letter that you see on the left. And it is the letter conveniently authored on NIAID letterhead sent to the University of NC, Chapel Hill which unambiguously states that during the gain-of-function moratorium – which, by the way, if we use the word ‘moratorium’, feels like you’re supposed to stop – why don’t we go ahead and look at two pieces of this letter.
First , second bullet under project 1 – which, by the way, was not part of the original grant – this was to look at the novel function of the virus pathogenesis in vivo – that means, in living system. The grant was supposed to be clinical simulations and models but this grant was modified with this letter to say we were going to authorize gain-of-function research during the moratorium in living systems.
And then we love the last paragraph of this letter which conveniently says ‘as your grant is currently funded, this pause is voluntary.’
How many times have you met a ‘voluntary moratorium’?
And the best part about it is that if we look at the very last line: ‘or we continue to conduct the applicable gain-of-function research until the end of the currently active budget period.’
But here comes the problem. You know who was supplying the budget? An indefinite term, unlimited amount contract from DARPA and NIH.
Isn’t it convenient to have a perpetually funded project that needs to stop when the money runs out – when you find out that there is no point when the money runs out – cause there is no end to the thing that has no end?
And lest you think that I am making an allegation, which I’m not, I’m making an accusation. Let’s be clear. And there’s a big difference. I’m not alleging anything.
They actually went to the trouble of telling us that it was going with the Wuhan virus that was gonna get us.
As you see on the right hand side of the screen, published in 2016, March 14th of 2016, ‘the SARS-like Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus One...and I quote: ‘is poised for human emergence’.
Does that sound like we’re just surprised that something in Wuhan went a little haywire in December of 2019? Or does it feel like we were told ‘look at Wuhan’ and ‘look at Corona Virus’ and look at what we’ve been doing to manipulate Corona Virus in Wuhan and the University of NC Chapel Hill. And lo and behold we’re going to go ahead and tell you to release it in 2016.
Next slide – we’re almost done
And then they created it. Now all of you know that I am criticized globally for my use of the term biological warfare. I do that because I am credentialed. I happen to be for the United States government in the early part of the 2000’s and the latter part of the 90’s a person who was sent around the world to look at the proliferation of biologic chemical weapons. I’m acutely familiar with the definition of what a biological warfare agent is in the US 18 code, criminal code of violations of biological and chemical weapons.
And so, my assessment is, in fact, professional and right. And the reason for that is I’m the one credentialed to make that determination for the United States government for many years. That’s why I say it.
But let’s pretend for the moment that I’m just a nutjob. Maybe I don’t know what I’m talking about.
So, why don’t we look at what the criminals said themselves. Shall we?
In 2005, at a conference sponsored by DARPA and the MITRE Corp., Ralph Berrick, the architect of the lethal strand that has been injected into millions and billions of people’s arms – that Ralph Berrick – was sponsored to present the following – and let’s go ahead and use his words, presentation:
‘synthetic corona viruses bio-hacking bio warfare enabling technologies’
Does that sound like a public distribution program? Does that sound like something that is accidentally misinterpreted to mean something else?
Does biological warfare enabling technology sound like not counter measures or pandemic preparedness.
It sounds to me like biological warfare enabling technologies. And the reason why I have that hunch – is what followed – was he received next to his NIAID grants, non-competitive DARPA grants in matching funds for over $140Million of aggregate funding going into his and his related programs on synthetic biological warfare technologies .
So, do I have a problem calling the injection a biological enabling warfare technology? – ABSOLUTELY NOT! BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT THEY CALLED IT.
And we know that they knew they called it that on September 18th 2019!
Because on September 18th, 2019 the racketeering, co-conspiring cabal of interlocking directorates, aka the WHO said that they would conduct an experience for the world that was going to be a rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen.
The lethality in that statement is the problem.
They didn’t say that we’re going to maybe get a little bit of sniffles going around. They said we were going to actually have the promulgation of a deadly agent. And the stated reason in September 2020, ‘the progress indicator is that the world would accept a universal vaccine.’
Not – we’ll look at other options of treatment.
Not – we’ll have a look at what might be early intervention as Dr, McCullough has so clearly advocated for in many, many, many instances.
Not that.
We stated on September 18th 2019 we were intending to kill. And we were intending to kill to create the fear that would drive people to accept something that without coercion – no one would have accepted.
And that was published by the criminal racketeers.
Next slide and there’s only two to go if you’re following along
Deploy and profit from it
We were told investors would respond if they see profit at the end of the process and lo-and-behold guess what they saw?
Profit at the end of the process.
2022 – $100 Billion for Pfizer of public funds
Moderna, after lying to the Congress in October of 2020 when they were asked to actually verify whether NIAID was promoting an injection that would enrich NIAID where Anthony Fauci and the entire team at NIH said that they had no financial interest in their recommendation, they receive a back payment royalty of $400 million – for the FIRST payment of the royalty...
$400 million
More than any institute of health has ever received in a single payment for a single invention in the history of American medical research.
And lo-and-behold, what do we receive after that? A request from the World Health Organization to expand it’s budget by 11% to make sure that the people who profited from that, donate to it. And guess what they just did? They laundered the money right back.
That’s what they did.
Next, and now you get the final slide
This is not a public health crime.
This is not a Constitutional crime.
This is a criminal act done by a criminal institution established to commit criminal behavior since its foundation in 1947. That is what this is.
We should not be debating the merits of democracy or liberty or anything else.
As irrational as that would be – if we stood at a bank robbery and debated the merit of printing dollar bills – the problem is not the dollar bills. It’s the bank robber.
And the problem here is not health and it’s not public health and it’s not the suppression of information and the suppression of dissident views and the unconscionable treatment of physicians in the world and academicians of the world who spoke out against this . That’s not the crime
The crime is that we have criminal racketeers who conspired and developed a quote ‘emergency’ . The same criminal racketeers planned, manufactured and did all agency capture to make sure you were told that you would use terms that they tell you to use. Vaccine, face mask, health, social distancing, – none of which had ordinary use definition.
So we just used them.
Criminal racketeers price fixed with interlocking directorates where known competitors came together and fixed prices in direct collusion in violation of European Union standards and in violation of the Sherman and Clayton Acts of the United States.
These were crimes, it is organized crime and we should treat it as such.
Criminal racketeers publicly lied under oath. This resulted in the death and destruction of liberty and most importantly the death and destruction of the integrity of well meaning people who sit here today doing everything they can in their power to try to treat the calamities created by this catastrophe.
I will not for a moment denigrate the multiple contributions of amazing academic and medical professionals who tried desperately to step into the gap and stop the corrupt outcomes of these crimes .
But I will, without doubt, say the following...
UNTIL WE TREAT THIS AS A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY OF CRIMINAL RACKETEERS RESULTING IN GLOBAL TERRORISM FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROFITEERING AND MURDER, UNTIL WE HAVE THAT CONVERSATION...WE’RE HAVING THE WRONG CONVERSATION.
because we are not hear to debate the merits of a modified agreement for a criminal organization – we are here to end the criminal organization itself.
This is my call to every single person on this planet.
DON’T JUST LIMIT THE POWER OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. DESTROY THE WHO.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH. (54:55)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.