[MtnClimber]

My prediction is that the “judge” will not allow cameras and will put a gag order in place to shield the show trial from the public. Then the MSM can tell the public what “really, really, we promise” happened.

[BobL]

Bitch ain’t gonna allow no camera unless bitch is told to do so by her DNC ‘controllers’.

[Lurkina.n.Learnin]

Can’t let us actually see their show trial.

[plain talk]

I agree. Televise all of these Trump trials.

[Joe 6-pack]

Even Roland Freisler allowed cameras in his court rooms.

[Spok]

If you can see it live, it will be harder for the media to create its own narrative. They manufacture news that suits their agenda.

[Spok]

The DOJ will want a closed trial.

[MarMema]

When is court?

[zeestephen]

Almost all federal defendants are allowed to demand a televised trial.

Since about 95% of federal defendants plead guilty, few of them do demand it.

I believe there are some restrictions related to classified information, witness protection issues, and graphically violent or sexual testimony.

[Georgia Girl 2]

They’re apparently asking the SCOTUS to intervene and allow cameras.

[sauropod]

.

[euram]

It’s funny how a gaggle of dem bums in Congress are demanding that his trial be televised. Watch and see they will change their tune now that it’s come out that Trump also wants it televised.

[TexasFreeper2009]

I honestly think the trials will be better than political ads and cost Trump nothing.

[VMI70]

Think back to the OJ Simpson trial. Simpson and his legal team were much, much better actors than the prosecutors. That, and an incompetent Judge Ito made for a televised farce which helped OJ walk. I’d reluctantly go with audio but not video.

[Vaduz]

It would be good to see how the kangaroo court judge show how much she knows law or makes it.

[Jim Noble]

Defendants don’t get to “demand” cameras.