Posted on 07/27/2023 1:23:56 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
Trevor Sutcliffe @TrevorSutcliffe
Vivek Ramaswamy is not legally eligible to be President. The natural born citizen clause predates the Fourteenth Amendment by several decades. He is a Fourteenth Amendment/Wong Kim Ark citizen, not a natural-born citizen. His campaign for the Presidency is illegitimate.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
This is pure projection on your part!
LOL. you win the internet today.
Law.? What law..? Haven't you heard, this is now a democracy....the majority is what rules this nation, the LAW has become irrelevant..
The way I look at it could he be any worse than the “natural born pig” in the WH?
Seems there’s so many candidates that are not eligible yet end up running without any opposition.
Were his parents citizens at his birth?
If not he is not a nbc
Not this *again meme.
> The left has done whatever they want and the republicans play like obedient children. <
And what’s worse, the media plays like obedient children. The Founders knew that the press was a strong check against government corruption. That’s why they wisely guaranteed a free press in the very first amendment.
Todays press has abdicated all their responsibilities to the country.
Were his parents citizens at his birth?
If not he is not a nbc
“the phrase “natural born Citizen” in the Constitution encompasses all such citizens from birth. Thus, an individual born to a U.S. citizen parent — whether in California or Canada or the Canal Zone — is a U.S. citizen from birth and is fully eligible to serve as President if the people so choose.”
“born to a US citizen parent”...NBC requirement.
That ship sailed in 08 get over it
As opposed to C - section?
If he was born within the United States to parents legally within the United States at the time of his birth, he is a natural born citizen. Period. That is what the phrase meant at the time it was written, and has been adjudicated multiple times.
That appears to be the case with him, therefore, he is a natural born citizen. It is absolutely false to state otherwise. This twitter poster is ignorant at best and could not possibly have done any significant research into the subject - and of course neither did you before posting.
No, his parents weren’t naturalized as citizens when he was born. He’s a statutory Citizen but not an Article 2 Section 1 natural born Citizen.
If his parents were legally within the United States at the time of his birth, yes. That is what the phrase meant at the time it was written, and this has been adjudicated multiple times. This is not debatable, yet people continue to spread this false garbage.
He most certainly is. If his parents were legally within the United States at the time of his birth, he is. This is what the phrase meant at the time it was written, and has been adjudicated multiple times. Not debatable.
and he is currently running the current fake biden organization crime family.
they don’t want to stop v from running for pres... they want to block him from running for veep...
any mostly maga candidate will result in street riots, fires, murders and kinetic civil war from the ant tee fah clan members who work for the alphabet agencies...
deep staters, are like taters, full of eyes and rotting in the cellar activities.
but you have no power to do anything about it. You are not on SCOTUS.
if it were at the time of our constitutions formation... yes.
but he would have to renounce his title and estate as KING.
that it is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.