It’s Not The 50-50 Country that the Woke Want Us to Think It Is: Signs are everywhere that increasing numbers of Americans are actively resisting the woke

The radical left are desperate that we all believe two things.

They want us all to believe America is divided — half woke, half not. It’s why Anderson Cooper called Trump supporters, “…that audience that upset you, that’s a sampling of about half the country.” It’s why, in his red speech, Biden claimed half of America is MAGA. It’s why TV news would report a 2022 UC Davis survey where half the subjects saw democracy as imperiled and expected civil war.

Placing the divide at 50-50 makes their side look bigger than it is; and ours, smaller. The illusion there’s no clear majority supposedly indicates instability, and “broken” government, which requires a Civil War 2.0. Until the right-wing steps up to fill the political violence quota, the left is doing the stirring.

Persistent shortages of dangerous right-wing characters and incidents of bigotry leaves the left clinging to ridiculous hoaxes, and continually dredging up a few old stories (e.g., the Charlottesville “fine people” hoax). Jussie Smollett himself wouldn’t really believe two Chicago MAGA “Empire” viewers were lurking in a polar vortex, just to tie clothesline around someone’s neck. Slurs shouted during every serve by a college volleyball player went unheard and unrecorded by anyone else? Nascar driver Bubba Wallace’s discovery of a rope loop on a Talladega garage door was rightly a cause for concern?

Antifa burning Portland, Minneapolis and Milwaukee for months was “mostly peaceful.” An actually peaceful and huge one-day gathering, where a few dubious characters broke some windows and put feet on Pelosi’s desk, and one protestor was killed by a (never charged) Capitol Police officer, was “insurrection.” Draconian treatment was unevenly distributed.

When NONE of them can answer the simple question “what is a woman?”, except with a circular answer like “somebody that identifies and is accepted by women as a woman”. Sorry, that isn’t a definition.

When they’re arguing that somebody is ‘trans’, they say you can ‘transition’ to the opposite sex, and if so, we’re back to ‘binary’ sexes (there’s only men and women)...where they’re also arguing sex and gender are different and gender is a social construct.

If a *man* doesn’t want to date a trans-woman, you’re transphobic. But what is a “man” as we can’t define a woman? When you say you “feel like a woman”. How would you know? You’ve never been one. Gay *men* (there’s that word again) don’t want to date trans-men. So transphobic right? Resorting to definitions which include “a non-man”, to mean something about lesbians that includes trans-women, when “man” can’t be defined....it’s just NUTS!!!

Now I heard a man that is ‘trans’ and has ‘transitioned’ to be a woman but identifies as a lesbian, so is attracted to women, is a valid identity. To think they argue that all this should be considered “normal” and the State has decided that your children must be taught this, no dissent, and if you don’t “affirm your child’s gender” you can have your child taken, it’s all tyrannical. Hormone blockers on minors! Cut off breasts! Chemical castration!

And we haven’t even got to men being in women’s private places (bathrooms, changing rooms, prisons, shelters(!)) or competing in sports with women.

Then they try the argument, why do you care? It doesn’t impact YOU. What??? At this point YES, it does. It can impact ANYONE.

If you can believe that all makes sense, then you can call yourself a leftist. Somehow, just maybe, most people, the large majority, see this for what it is.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.