Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Top Department of Justice Official Blows Up Jack Smith’s Case Against President Trump With One Tweet – Notices Key Item on Third Page of the Federal Indictment That Is “Grounds for Granting a Motion” to Dismiss
The Gateway Pundit ^ | June 10, 2023 | Cullen Linebargar

Posted on 06/10/2023 10:46:42 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man

A former top Department of Justice official completely blew up Special Counsel Jack Smith’s inquisition against President Trump with one simple tweet on Friday. He claims there is a key piece of information in the indictment that is grounds for a quick dismissal.

..... Snip.....

CNN “reported” on May 31 that federal prosecutors had “obtained an audio recording of a summer 2021 meeting in which former President Donald Trump acknowledges he held onto a classified Pentagon document about a potential attack on Iran.” The network claims this destroys Trump’s argument that he declassified everything.

Jeffrey Clark, who served as an assistant attorney general in the Trump administration, says the leak is grounds for having the case tossed. Moreover, it proves Biden’s corrupt DOJ was the source of the leaks rather than Trump’s attorneys.

The details regarding the recording of Bedminster call is in the sixth paragraph of page 3 of the indictment.

Here are the relevant parts of the tweet:

I’m beginning to read the indictment against Trump. But even three pages in, it’s clear that the leaks that preceded the indictment are far too close to what is actually being pleaded by DOJ to be a coincidence.

For example, in paragraph 6a on page 3, we hear about the recording of the Bedminster call, which the MSNBC’s of the world have been beating a dead horse about for quite a while based on such leaks.

This means that Trump lawyers could not possibly be the source of the leaks.

Ergo, the leaks are coming from DOJ. They must be investigated and punished.

Also, this is grounds for granting a motion highlighting jury pool poisoning and dismissing the indictment before it reaches even its one-month birthday.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bidengate; doj; fbi; harassment; jacksmith; jeffreyclark; joebiden; miamigrandjury; persecution; specialcounsel; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: Macho MAGA Man

bkmk


21 posted on 06/10/2023 12:14:00 PM PDT by xenia ( “The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it” George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

The leaks could be coming from the writers who were in the meeting. Or their attorneys. Or Mark Meadows office.


22 posted on 06/10/2023 12:15:36 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: euram
None of the liars have been punished, and none of them will ever be punished.

Well, let's get Trump back in the WH and see. It's no more Mr. Nice guy at this point and he needs to set a lot of people straight.

23 posted on 06/10/2023 1:01:18 PM PDT by Bullish (Either we don't see it coming or they don't... But somebody's got it coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

The 3 greatest and most awesome powers of the media - Report on it, Ignore it, or Lie about it!

If the mediots ignore it or lie about the event, “Did it really happen?”

“The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became the truth!” – George Orwell, 1984!!!!

https://i.imgflip.com/sr6fh.jpg


24 posted on 06/10/2023 1:04:58 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (We have no shortage of experts, who state things as fact, but really have no idea!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Uh, the Pentagon has A LOT of documents on possible scenarios. Most of it just planning based on a premise.

Like the end of “War Games”! Wouldn’t they rather play a nice game of chess?


25 posted on 06/10/2023 1:08:05 PM PDT by Fledermaus (It's time to get rid of the Three McStooges; Mitch, Kevin and Ronna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aynrandfreak

“Grounds is one thing, but not enough in this environment”.

I agree.

I’ve gone from being nervous to being worried about this.


26 posted on 06/10/2023 1:11:39 PM PDT by laplata (They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Or, someone on the grand jury leaked them, which is also grounds for dismissal.


27 posted on 06/10/2023 1:13:46 PM PDT by StAnDeliver (Tanned, rested, and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

This is absolute garbage legal work by the JustUs department.


28 posted on 06/10/2023 1:19:44 PM PDT by Trumpisourlastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen
" Trump did nominate Judge Aileen Cannon, but Senate Democrats confirmed her. Only 44 Republicans showed up for work that day. 12 Democrats pushed her across the Finish Line. Politically, this was not an inspiring victory for judicial Conservatives."

So what? Did you not read Judge Cannon's orders after the Mar-A-Lago raid? She will not react kindly to this hubris of indicting Trump aide Walt Nauta.

Did Biden's aides have the appropriate security clearances?

This is exactly what District Judge Aileen Cannon referenced in the Mar-a-Lago raid:

But Biden's counsel found his last batch, or his legal team of what, paralegals? Runners? Gophers? None of whom ever had clearance to handle SCIF material!

So Nauta's indictment is a non-starter, and Cannon will likely be harsh on the DOJ for having attempted to make an example of an ordinary American by bankrupting him through federal lawfare.

29 posted on 06/10/2023 1:26:19 PM PDT by StAnDeliver (Tanned, rested, and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

Bingo! That’s very much true!


30 posted on 06/10/2023 1:35:24 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man (The last two weren't balloons. One was a cylindrical objects )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

.


31 posted on 06/10/2023 1:39:15 PM PDT by sauropod (“If they don’t believe our lies, well, that’s just conspiracy theorist stuff, there.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

What does the period stand for?


32 posted on 06/10/2023 1:50:50 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man (The last two weren't balloons. One was a cylindrical objects )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man
Oh, lookie here!

The DOJ "candidly acknowledged the unfortunate existence of leaks to the press" in Judge Cannon's footnotes of the original Order!

The footnotes are the most enlightening part of the Order. Some of them are extraordinary in smacking down the FBI/DOJ/ZOMBIEREGIME and laying miles of groundwork for what may be an abrupt Order of Dismissal:

  • Page 4, note 2:" Based on the Detailed Property Inventory, of the approximately 11,000 documents seized, roughly 100 contain classification markings [ECF No. 39-1 pp. 2–8]."

  • Page 10, note 1: "When asked about the dissemination to the media of information relative to the contents of the seized records, Government’s counsel stated that he had no knowledge of any leaks stemming from his team but candidly acknowledged the unfortunate existence of leaks to the press."

Case dismissed! Impeach Garland!

33 posted on 06/10/2023 1:51:11 PM PDT by StAnDeliver (Tanned, rested, and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Exactly.


34 posted on 06/10/2023 2:59:01 PM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Thank Goodness. A magic Tookus to dosmiss.


35 posted on 06/10/2023 4:45:41 PM PDT by Candor7 ( ( Ask not for whom THE Trump trolls...He trolls for thee!)<img src=""width=500></img>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

It’s a placeholder. A bookmark. So i don’t lose the article.


36 posted on 06/10/2023 4:49:14 PM PDT by sauropod (“If they don’t believe our lies, well, that’s just conspiracy theorist stuff, there.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

I suspect that they want to get this cased thrown out on a technicality, just so they can say that they tried to indict him but trump’s lawyers weaseled out of it. Then they just say he must be guilty, but we’ll never know.


37 posted on 06/10/2023 4:54:04 PM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

“THIS IS grounds for dismissal.”

Ideally — in a fair world, and free republic. But who would dismiss? Nobody.


38 posted on 06/10/2023 5:14:34 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man
Nick Moseder on Telegram

https://t.me/WILFMoseder/13048

"NEW: Special Counsel Smith's indictment alleges Trump showed off a military paper that he boasted was classified "highly confidential" and "secret," but the transcript reveals Trump actually said: "like, highly confidential" and "a secret." Smith omitted the words "like" and "a."

And here we go again. The biggest bombshell portion of the Jack Smith indictment - the Bedminster tape - has already been debunked

Smith tampered with the evidence

39 posted on 06/10/2023 5:21:21 PM PDT by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver
My point...

When is the last time 12 Democrats made a mistake about a federal judge?

Supreme Court Justice Byron White - in 1962.

White turned out to be Center-Left instead of Always-Left.

40 posted on 06/10/2023 5:47:36 PM PDT by zeestephen (Trump "Lost" By 43,000 Votes - Spread Across Three States - GA, WI, AZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson